[NSRCA-discussion] Topic Changed to judgin' problem?
george w. kennie
geobet at gis.net
Mon Feb 4 17:32:57 AKST 2008
Gee Del,
You must be mellowing ! That all sounds like what I was pondering. I think you're right on.
G.
----- Original Message -----
From: Del Rykert
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Topic Changed to judgin' problem?
I am going to ask something and not meaning to annoy or offend anyone.
1. Do we truly have a significant judging problem?
2. If we do - is it a perceived problem by a few or the majority?
3. Where does the it mostly occur? At local / regional or at the Nat's?
4. After the problem/s are identified and agreed upon what is the most practical and effective means of addressing the problem/s .
My initial belief is that it may be occasional and with a 1 on 1 situation where 1 judge saw things differently than what the pilot or caller thought. If it is a repeatable problem with the same individual then we have a education or enlightenment problem hopefully.
If Bias or personal favorites are occurring and it is a repeatable demonstration then it would appear that either a new rule may need to be created to address it if the current measure that are available are proven to be inadequate.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Billings" <auto7832 at bellsouth.net>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.f3a.us>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Exper Class??
> And how is all of this going to improve judging? I think that was the
> subject.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Woodward, Jim" <jim.woodward at baesystems.com>
> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.f3a.us>
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 2:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Exper Class??
>
>
> It's interesting how a question (and answer) regarding the Tangerine peer
> judging morphed into: F at local contests, RCU Thread Poll, killing
> Masters, Expert Class, and Forced Advancement.
>
> It shows just how perfectly one issue (... or all), affect the whole
> outcome and experience of everyone. We are not so big as to risk affecting
> the individual, but must make decisions for and on behalf of the whole.
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
~~ klipped for reposting ~~~
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080205/15d8fbd7/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list