[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal

[JShulman]

Wow, you mean I still get kiddie points.... best news all day...lol

Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
rcmaster199 at aol.com
  Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:14 PM
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal


  Ohhhhh!!!!!!!!!!

  Do you mean we should stop giving Jason and Andrew kiddie points????

  MattK



  -----Original Message-----
  From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
  To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
  Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 9:13 am
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal


You were kidding?   I wasn't kidding about getting special scoring
bonuses for age and (lack of) height.  Or was I?    Ron VP    On Apr 30,
2008, at 6:01 AM, John Konneker wrote:    > Matt,  > You know I'm just
kidding right?  > :-)  > JLK  >  >  > From: mjfrederick at cox.net  > To:
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:40:55 -0500  >
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > I don't see the
necessity for such a proposal... All the people you    > are competing with
in your region (hence breaking the NSRCA up into    > districts) are dealing
with the same problem. It would be a net    >
 zero change in the results, just allowing you to feel better about    >
yourself because you got better scores... to quote the Godfather...    >
"After all, we are not communists..." While we're at it let's just    >
change the name of the sport to Soccer...  >  > Matt  >  > Yeah, I know I'm
gonna ruffle some feathers with the soccer    > remark... get over it...
 > ----- Original Message -----  > From: John Konneker  > To: General
pattern discussion  > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:34 PM  > Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > Anthony,  > Please don't
think of it as a "handicap".  > Think of it as a well...let's call it what
it is.  > A "Correction Factor".  > I can see this process causing a lot of
changes.  > How 'bout the monthly magazine's name becomming "The NSRCA    >
Correction Factor"?!?  > This is only the tip of the iceberg (get
it...iceberg...lol)  > JLK  >  >  >
 ; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:19:51 -0700  > From: aabdu at sbcglobal.net  > To:
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules
change proposal  >  > John,  > You are a fricking genius. As a snow belt
sufferer living less than    > 90 miles from Buffalo New York, I could use
the "handicap" to    > adjust for our nearly 8 month long winter and
subsequent RC    > inactivity.  >  > Tim Wortkoetter
<twortkoetter at yahoo.com> wrote:  > I think it should also apply to people
who have two kids under the    > age of 3.  >  > Tim Wortkoetter  >  > -----
Original Message ----  > From: John Konneker <jlkonn at hotmail.com>  > To:
Discussion List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrc
 a.org>  > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:56:43 PM  > Subject:
[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > I have been impressed by the
spirit of fair play and sportsmanship    > in the NSRCA since returning to
pattern.  > I feel though that there has been an oversight in the rules that
I    > think now could be corrected.  > I just got in from flying my Focus
II for the first time since last    > October.  > It (I) was terrible!  The
long winter layoffs here in the northern    > climes imposes a real hardship
on pattern pilots living here.  > To be fair I would like to propose an
adjustment to the maneuver k-   > factors based on the annual mean
temperature and  > extreme lows (I want to leave out highs) of where one
lives.  > For example my lowest k-factor would be 10 for landing and takeoff
> and then go up from there according to degree of difficulty of  >
maneuver.  In some cases I can see 20+ easily.  >
  Folks like Derek, Ron Davies, Chris Fitzsimmons living in    > California
would have highest k-factors of 1...who knows...maybe    > even fractional
or minus.  These k-factors would be assigned by    > pilot and voted on only
by members that have at least 24" of snow    > each year.  > What do you all
think?  > I want to be fair.  > JLK  >  > Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.    > Try it
now._______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion
mailing list  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  >  >
_______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion mailing
list  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  >  >
_______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion mailing
list  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________  NSRCA-discussion mailing
list  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  Plan your next roadtrip with MapQuest.com: America's #1 Mapping Site.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.6/1404 - Release Date: 4/29/2008
6:27 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080430/49c7c782/attachment-0001.html