[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal

[rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Ohhhhh!!!!!!!!!!


?


Do you mean we should stop giving Jason and Andrew kiddie points???? 


?


MattK










-----Original Message-----

From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>

To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 9:13 am

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal





You were kidding?   I wasn't kidding about getting special scoring    bonuses for age and (lack of) height.  Or was I?    Ron VP    On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:01 AM, John Konneker wrote:    > Matt,  > You know I'm just kidding right?  > :-)  > JLK  >  >  > From: mjfrederick at cox.net  > To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:40:55 -0500  > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > I don't see the necessity for such a proposal... All the people you    > are competing with in your region (hence breaking the NSRCA up into    > districts) are dealing with the same problem. It would be a net    > zero change in the results, just allowing you to feel better about    > yourself because you got better scores... to quote the Godfather...    > "After all, we are not communists..." While we're at it let's just    > change the name of the sport to Soccer...  >  > Matt  >  > Yeah, I kno
 w I'm gonna ruffle some feathers with the soccer    > remark... get over it...  > ----- Original Message -----  > From: John Konneker  > To: General pattern discussion  > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:34 PM  > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > Anthony,  > Please don't think of it as a "handicap".  > Think of it as a well...let's call it what it is.  > A "Correction Factor".  > I can see this process causing a lot of changes.  > How 'bout the monthly magazine's name becomming "The NSRCA    > Correction Factor"?!?  > This is only the tip of the iceberg (get it...iceberg...lol)  > JLK  >  >  > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:19:51 -0700  > From: aabdu at sbcglobal.net  > To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > John,  > You are a fricking genius. As a snow belt sufferer living less than    > 90 miles from Buffalo New York, I
  could use the "handicap" to    > adjust for our nearly 8 month long winter and subsequent RC    > inactivity.  >  > Tim Wortkoetter <twortkoetter at yahoo.com> wrote:  > I think it should also apply to people who have two kids under the    > age of 3.  >  > Tim Wortkoetter  >  > ----- Original Message ----  > From: John Konneker <jlkonn at hotmail.com>  > To: Discussion List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:56:43 PM  > Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > I have been impressed by the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship    > in the NSRCA since returning to pattern.  > I feel though that there has been an oversight in the rules that I    > think now could be corrected.  > I just got in from flying my Focus II for the first time since last    > October.  > It (I) was terrible!  The long winter layoffs here in the northern    > climes impose
 s a real hardship on pattern pilots living here.  > To be fair I would like to propose an adjustment to the maneuver k-   > factors based on the annual mean temperature and  > extreme lows (I want to leave out highs) of where one lives.  > For example my lowest k-factor would be 10 for landing and takeoff    > and then go up from there according to degree of difficulty of  > maneuver.  In some cases I can see 20+ easily.  > Folks like Derek, Ron Davies, Chris Fitzsimmons living in    > California would have highest k-factors of 1...who knows...maybe    > even fractional or minus.  These k-factors would be assigned by    > pilot and voted on only by members that have at least 24" of snow    > each year.  > What do you all think?  > I want to be fair.  > JLK  >  > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.    > Try it now._______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion mailing lis
 t  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  >  > _______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion mailing list  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  >  > _______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion mailing list  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion    _______________________________________________  NSRCA-discussion mailing list  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080430/f5b4d728/attachment.html