[NSRCA-discussion] Mid-Air discussion

[Jay Marshall]

And perhaps also, a greater wind advantage.

 

Jay Marshall 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Mark Atwood
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 2:18 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mid-Air discussion

 

I doubt there are many flying sites that could accommodate that, and it by
necessity puts the sun in one of the two boxes...




On 9/28/07 2:13 PM, "Bob Richards" <bob at toprudder.com> wrote:

In looking at it, why not offset each line 30'.  Total of 60' offset between
the two lines. This would put the box boundary on one side of each line at
the flight line. Would make the "diamond of death" much smaller in area.
  
 
  
Bob R.
  


Mark Atwood <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com> wrote:
  

AWESOME...That's EXACTLY what I was looking for. I'm pleasantly
surprised...it does significantly reduce the overlapping footprint.

Another "benefit" of this offset is that there will be FAR fewer incidents
where the planes will APPEAR to be in danger. Because of that, we might be
able to react more aggressively regarding avoidence, since there will be a
LOT fewer disruptions with reduced close calls. I.e. It won't feel like the
boy that cried wolf so often.

Also, with airplanes coming together from two distinct angles, the pilot and
callers ability to see a collision course is MUCH higher as the perspective
will allow a more accurate evaluation of depth.

Interesting...I like it.

-M



 

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070928/068d890f/attachment.html