[NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results

[Tony]

Yes, that is new for this year..

 

Tony Stillman, President

Radio South, Inc.

139 Altama Connector, Box 322

Brunswick, GA  31525

1-800-962-7802

tony at radiosouthrc.com

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Earl Haury
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 5:47 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results

 

Matt

 

I believe that the method of determining the team placing changes with the
'09 WC. 

 

"The team classification is established at the end of the competition (after
the finals) by adding the numerical final placing of the three team members
of each nation. Teams are ranked from the lowest numerical scores to the
highest, with complete three-competitor teams, ahead of two-competitor
teams, which in turn are ranked ahead of one-competitor teams. In case of a
tie, the best individual placing decides the team ranking."

 

Earl

 

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: rcmaster199 at aol.com 

To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 

Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:32 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results

 

Took a quick look at the P09 schedule and, at first glance, laughed at the
simplicity. It dawned on me that the WC gets about 100+ contestants, all of
whom need processing (read- prelim flying rounds). Then, the simplicity
makes perfect sense. But did they go a little overboard in dumbing it down??
The team award is still awarded after the P is done so it probably brings a
bunch of teams into it who otherwise would not be. It will be interesting to
see what develops in two years, particularly Judging and Scoring simple
patterns.

 

F schedule is a different issue

 

MattK

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Mike Hester <mailto:kerlock at comcast.net>  

To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:21 AM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results

 

5:00am and we just got home....

 

FAI....well...it was the best of patterns, it was the worst of
patterns....LOL

 

I'll just say it's a lot more difficult than it looks on paper. A lot of
guys had some really great looking stuff, but nobody had the pattern nailed
yet. it flows VERY nice and the really cool thing...even judging 10 pilots
wasn't too bad! Because of the way they shortened them up, it was about like
judging intermediate as far as time goes. The crosswinds were brutal and the
box was an issue. The spin on the end of the box was an issue as well for
some. But it was great to see such a turnout to get on with the new stuff! 

 

Speaking of intermediate....Gary and Jon had the battle of the contest. In
the end Gary won by....get this.....3/ 10ths of a point!!!!!!!!!!! 

 

Great contest, thanks to Jon and the D6 guys for the hospitality!

 

-Mike

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: rcmaster199 at aol.com 

To: donramsey at gmail.com ; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 

Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 10:54 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results

 

Excellent turnout in Intermediate and Sportsman. Way to go guys.

 

MattK

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Ramsey <don.ramsey at suddenlink.net>
To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Sun, Oct 28 8:30 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results

Results for the Cajun NATS are posted on
http://pages.suddenlink.net/donramsey

_______________________________________________  NSRCA-discussion mailing
list  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  

  _____  


Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail
<http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/index.htm?ncid=A
OLAOF00020000000970> !


  _____  


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


  _____  


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________  NSRCA-discussion mailing
list  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  

  _____  


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20071029/2b220cc4/attachment-0001.html