[NSRCA-discussion] Judge Evaluation/Ranking

[george w. kennie]

Vicente,
It means nothing,..........Quadruple zero, triple Oh, double ott, nothing, NADA !  In every case it amounts to the calibre of your fellow judges on the rest of the panel for that round. So if you happen to get stuck with a couple of dodos who are awarding 9's and you're issuing legitimate downgrades you can be sure that your name will not be entered in the 1000 folder. 
G.





  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mike Hester 
  To: Don Ramsey ; NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:23 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Evaluation/Ranking


  Just a joke =)

  However I'm still trying to understand how it works. I have an idea, but it's all that "new math" LOL

  -Mike

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Don Ramsey 
    To: NSRCA Mailing List 
    Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:20 AM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Evaluation/Ranking


    In the Judge Evaluation Program no judge wins the round.  He is simply assigned a score that accesses his performance relative to the other judges based on 2 metrics, how he scored the flight relative to the average of the other judges and how he placed the pilots in the rounds versus their actual placing.

    Don

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Zapata, Lisandro Arturo 
      To: NSRCA Mailing List 
      Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 8:57 AM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Evaluation/Ranking


      I see George Asteris and John Fuqua with 1000

      -A



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hester
      Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:52 AM
      To: NSRCA Mailing List
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Evaluation/Ranking


      I don't see no 1000....so who won the round? =P

      -M
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Ron Van Putte 
        To: NSRCA Mailing List 
        Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:36 AM
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Evaluation/Ranking


        Just as in looking at a pilot's normalized score, the judge evaluation program rates the judges relative to a 1000 "perfect" score.  You need to look at whether a judge is low on placing, on scoring or on both.  It is possible, but looking at individual maneuver scores would be very difficult, since there's so much data out there. 


        Ron


        On Oct 25, 2007, at 7:27 AM, vicenterc at comcast.net wrote:


          Ron,

          This is a lot of work.  Looks nice.  Thanks to the evaluation/ranking committee.

          Now, I have a question.  How we can use this results to improve our judging?  For example, I noticed that I did well in one set but not so well in the other.  Just wondering if there is a way to know in which maneuvers I was having more problems.

          Best regards,

          --
          Vicente "Vince" Bortone

            -------------- Original message -------------- 
            From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> 
            The NSRCA judge evaluation/ranking committee (Tony Stillman, Matt Kebabjian and Ron Van Putte, with Don Ramsey acting as an advisor and doing most of the tabulation work), have posted the latest methodology and scores of the NSRCA Judge Evaluation program on 
            http://www.nsrca.org/competition/judging/judging.htm Scroll down to the bottom left of the page.


            Please understand that this is a work-in-progress and, since results from each competition are manually entered into the final listing, errors will occur. As errors are discovered, they will be fixed.


            Ron Van Putte




          From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
          Date: October 24, 2007 10:05:51 PM CDT
          To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
          Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Evaluation/Ranking




          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion






------------------------------------------------------------------------


        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20071025/78d56358/attachment-0001.html