[NSRCA-discussion] Judging-snap & spin

Ron Lockhart ronlock at comcast.net
Sat Oct 20 08:33:23 AKDT 2007


Eliminating is one solution - a price that comes with that solution is lack of practice doing and judging snaps-
which is desirable for some in AMA classes, and for sure for those looking ahead to F3A.

An in between thought - reduce the K factor considerable for snap and spin maneuvers.
That leaves them in the schedules, provides flying and judging practice on them, but reduces the
impact of the imperfect judging of them on round scores.

Ron Lockhart
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: BUDDYonRC at aol.com 
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
  Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 11:44 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging


  My cents worth on the subject.
  Snaps and Spin entry seem to cause much of the problem.
  Why do we continue to repeat trying to solve a problem that most agree is controversial at best and impossible to judge consistently on an equal basis?
  Seems that the best solution is to eliminate these from the schedules and pick maneuvers that more suit Precision Aerobatics and their ability to be judged correctly by everyone not just those who have advanced to the top of the super judge platform.

  Buddy





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20071020/923dd543/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list