[NSRCA-discussion] D3 FAI

Courtney, Gary Ray grcourtney at tva.gov
Tue Oct 16 04:24:28 AKDT 2007


 

________________________________

From: Courtney, Gary Ray 
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 7:07 AM
To: 'schroetere'
Subject: RE: [NSRCA-discussion] D3 FAI


yes! 
 
All I can hope for is to please my hardest critic and judge (myself)
because he truly knows what's being done in the air...That's why I very
rarely look at the score sheets and standings they are always 4 or 5
points higher than I would give myself. It's like x-mas every contest. 
 
The ? mark was referring to the fact that I don't have a solution,
Judging is not ever 100% perfect(human factor) it is what it is accept
it or pull your hair out over it.
 
 
Having judged FAI on rare occasions, I can say it's not very enjoyable
because the pressure I put on myself to try to be fair and consistent is
considerable. just to many elements for my feeble brain to process...
 
 
Gary

________________________________

From: schroetere [mailto:schroetere at bellsouth.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 6:33 AM
To: Courtney, Gary Ray
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] D3 FAI


I don't know, Jim started it and I just want to see where it goes. Did
you read his email below?

	----- Original Message ----- 
	From: Courtney, Gary Ray <mailto:grcourtney at tva.gov>  
	To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

	Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 7:07 AM
	Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] D3 FAI

	?
	 
	gary

________________________________

	From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
schroetere
	Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 5:20 AM
	To: NSRCA Mailing List
	Cc: Jim Woodward
	Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] D3 FAI
	
	
	 Hey Jim, 

	I debated with myself to respond to you or the list. But, since
you brought this up here, I'd like to hear some more from you and others
as well.

	I know that you are not alone in your frustration. We talked
about this mid-season at length. I'm just not sure what can be done to
"fix" judging differences. When it comes down to it, we are all human.
Until we get some sort of camera hooked up to a computer, we will never
have perfect judging. Even then, I'm sure someone will complain that the
software algorithm that calculates the score isn't correct. All we as
judges can do is sit down in the chair and do our best. Some times we
get it right and some times we don't. It will never be better than that
(my opinion).

	I hate to see that you are feeling so beaten down that you feel
a class switch is the only way to fix it. I have no doubt that you will
have great success in Masters if that is what you choose. To me, all the
guys flying FAI in our district should be there. You are all fantastic
pilots.

	So, what needs to be fixed in your opinion and how should this
be done? 

	Thanks, Emory

		----- Original Message ----- 
		From: Woodward, Jim <mailto:jim.woodward at baesystems.com>

		To: NSRCA Mailing List
<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
		Cc: McLaughlin, Ryan (FRS.JAX)
<mailto:ryan_mclaughlin at ml.com>  ; NSRCA District III
<mailto:dist3 at nsrca.org>  ; Joseph Walker <mailto:JWalker at ponikvar.com>

		Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 4:43 PM
		Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] D3 Championship

		

		It is my opinion that abject failure to score FAI rounds
and standings accurately has been consistently occurring in District 3,
punctuated by the final two contests of 2007 (JAX and D3 Champs).
Recognizing these inequities in FAI, I look forward to joining the
Masters class for the 2008 season beginning with the Tangerine.  

		

		Copied from www.dictionary.com   Abject: 

		-adjective 

1.

utterly hopeless, miserable, humiliating, or wretched: abject poverty. 

		

2.

contemptible; despicable; base-spirited: an abject coward. 

		

3.

shamelessly servile; slavish. 

		

4.

Obsolete. cast aside. 

		Thank You,

		Jim W.

		

	
________________________________


	

	_______________________________________________
	NSRCA-discussion mailing list
	NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
	http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
	
	
	__________ NOD32 2519 (20070910) Information __________
	
	This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
	http://www.eset.com
	

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20071016/ddf47248/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list