[NSRCA-discussion] Weather Vane
Stuart Chale
schale at optonline.net
Fri Oct 12 11:52:27 AKDT 2007
If a submarine had the shape of a pattern plane with the CG up near the
front third of the ship and a large amount of side area near the rear fins
then it would be an appropriate analogy. As the sub is pretty symmetrical
and likely has the CG near the center then I would not expect it to
water-vane
Stu
_____
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Terry
Beachler
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:59 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weather Vane
The boat analogy previously used would only be valid for a submarine. Wind
force and water force are two separate forces. Wind shear in the air may
some application, but that is not what we are talking about. We'll have to
ask a submariner if a submarine weathervanes or er ah watervanes. It
doesn't.
Terry Beachler
At 07:17 10/12/2007, you wrote:
Hi Jim.
Thanks for taking the time to post your reply. Wonder how many will
agree with your clarification. Some people are amazed with magic also..
<tic>
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Alberico" < <mailto:alberji at charter.net> alberji at charter.net >
To: "'NSRCA Mailing List'" < <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org >
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 11:19 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weather Vane
> Jim Oddino said:
>
>>>>> ====
> Wish we had a real aero guy jump in here. ...
>
> Best Regards, Jim
> ==== >>>>
>
> OK, Mr. Oddino, I'll take the bait.
>
> I qualify as a real aero guy much more than as a pattern pilot. ;-)
>
> This whole thread started with the dynamics of a stall turn in a crosswind
> (I think).
>
> Point 1:
> Initial Conditions
> -- steady wind from the right (constant velocity and direction).
> -- constant aircraft velocity (or vertical rate of the cg)
>
> To track a vertical line, the fuse must be pointed to the right. Under
> these conditions, the thrust line counters gravity as well as the
components
> of drag in the vertical and horizontal directions.
>
> This is similar to the familiar "crabbing" in horizontal flight to
maintain
> direction. However in the vertical geometric plane, gravity complicates
> things a bit. ...enough about that.
>
> Note that in crosswind, rudder trim is required to maintain the horizontal
> line, as well as the vertical line. This is important. Any
"weathervane"
> effect under these conditions is through control inputs. It doesn't come
> for free.
>
> Point 2:
> Dynamics Near Stall (dynamics are always more complicated)
> -- wind still steady from right
> -- aircraft is decelerating to zero, then accelerating again.
>
> As the vertical speed (and overall velocity) decreases, the fuse must be
> pointed more and more to the right to maintain a vertical track. Here is
> where it is very hard to generalize. So much depends on the details of
the
> aircraft shape, mass properties, control inputs (including throttle), the
> wind speed, and etc. At zero speed, for example, the ONLY force
countering
> the wind will be thrust. Sideslip forces certainly enter the picture on
the
> final path up and the initial path down.
>
> Note also that the fuse must point leftward during the downward phase to
> maintain the line (hence turning into the wind requires less than 180 deg
> rotation). Again, pilot provides the rudder trim to maintain the line.
> Here fuselage side force plays greater role, as thrust is significantly
> reduced.
>
> ...
>
> Regarding weathervane, the phenomenon is certainly present, but only in
> dynamic situations.
>
> ... But again, depends on what you mean by weathervane ... In 3D, is a
> steady angled hover in a steady wind considered weathervaning?
>
> I think not, but I also do not even think a weathervane "weathervanes"
> after steady state is established...
>
> I understand the physics fairly well...I just haven't learned to harness
it
> nearly as well as just about everyone here. ;-)
>
> The graceful way you guys fly is amazing.
>
> Thanks for reading. Be sure to catch the movie version someday.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jim A
> (ultra-newbie pattern flyer)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.8/1064 - Release Date: 10/11/2007
15:09
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20071012/e443aa76/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list