[NSRCA-discussion] Rudder

Del K. Rykert drykert2 at rochester.rr.com
Tue Oct 9 12:39:32 AKDT 2007


I still find it amazing after all these years it is people with full scale experience that rarely have a problem with the concept Bill just mentioned.
 
    Del 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: billglaze 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 3:28 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rudder


  Correct.  The airplane does NOT know the wind is blowing.  If we were moving in the same direction/velocity the wind is moving, (thus matching the airplane direction/velocity), the airplane would have no vector.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Terry Beachler 
    To: NSRCA Mailing List 
    Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 2:59 PM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rudder



    J & B
    Weather vane implies the wind blowing the tail away from and the nose into the wind which would be desirable for (self)correcting for crosswind. This would imply that an airplane on a cross country flight would self correct into a crosswind, no crab necessary. Or the reverse, pilot would have to hold rudder for a couple of hours on a cross country flight. Talk about a way to induce asymmetrical leg muscles...wow!

    Rudder is used to point the noise into the wind i.e. to induce crab. Full scale pilots make a small coordinated turn into the wind to create crab angle and the desired ground track. I think I read in some pattern stuff that pattern pilots can induce crab and it either presents better to a judge or they can sneak the crab in a way not so easily detected by the judge.  Weathervaning would only happen on the ground with a taildragger, usually the beginning of a ground loop. Or with the airplane on a pylon on the vertical axis, just like a weathervane.

    Crab angle and track apply here. Crosswind acts upon the whole airplane in flight, not just the tail surface. If we turn this whole situation 90 degrees and fly into a headwind and pull up, the airplane would flop over on its back because of the greater exposed surface of the wing area. The wing would have a greater weathervane effect. But it does not work thataway.

    Bob and I have been having fun with this one for a while.

    Terry Beachler

    At 13:01 10/9/2007, you wrote:


      weathervane by cause of wind. If you straighten the plane out to look vertical, the track (actual line drawn) will move with the wind and not be vertical and be cause for a downgrade. Someone has a clip from the rule book covering all parts of this.
       

      Regards,
      Jason
      www.jasonshulman.com
      www.shulmanaviation.com
      www.composite-arf.com 

        -----Original Message-----

        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [ mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Terry Beachler

        Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:53 PM

        To: NSRCA Mailing List

        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rudder


        Do you mean crab (induce by rudder) or weathervane as if the wind is applying a force upon the tail and causing a turn toward the wind about the vertical axis.


        Terryb


        At 12:10 10/9/2007, you wrote:


          Hi Bob,


            
          The airplane should weathervane into the wind, as long as the track of the plane is straight (track- actual line/path of the plane). 



            
          Regards,

          Jason

          www.jasonshulman.com

          www.shulmanaviation.com

          www.composite-arf.com 
            -----Original Message----- 
            From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [ mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bob Wilson 
            Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 8:53 AM 
            To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
            Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rudder


            Some great ideas. 
            I'm going to give the 60-70% rudder expo a shot and see how it works.

            I'd like to do the stall turns on low rate, as Jason reccommends, but when stall turning into the wind my practice airplane will not go vertical (on the downline) unless I have high rates (it weathervanes slightly towards the wind). 

            I also liked John Pavlick's recommendation on the two consecutive rolls.  I'm probably being too anal in coordinating rudder, aileron and elevator because I always seem to run out of room.

            So much to learn and the damn winter is coming!

            Thanks guys,

            Bob Wilson


          _______________________________________________

          NSRCA-discussion mailing list

          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



          No virus found in this incoming message.

          Checked by AVG Free Edition. 

          Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.6/1059 - Release Date: 10/9/2007 08:44


      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


      No virus found in this incoming message.
      Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
      Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.6/1059 - Release Date: 10/9/2007 08:44


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20071009/e0f58096/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list