[NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral

[Davel322 at comcast.net]

A60 / 5300s vs C50 / 5000s will be very close to a wash.  The unsinked ESC will be about 1 oz lighter.  Both motors need fore and aft mounting provisions - so that aspect should be about the same.

Dave

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: <andrewjesky at charter.net> 

> Ed, 
> 
> The Hacker A60-22s outrunner weighs in about 3 ounces heavier then the C-50 
> motor. So with the heavier motor and lighter packs I would assume that with the 
> setup you mentioned you might be about the same weight as I'm at right now. 
> 
> Andrew 
> ---- Ed Miller wrote: 
> > Thanks Andrew. So with Pro Lite TP5300's, a speed controller sans heat 
> > sinks and a Hacker outrunner it would be reasonable to expect an overall 
> > weight 5 to 6 ounces lighter. 
> > Ed M. 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "andrew" 
> > To: "NSRCA Mailing List" 
> > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 11:02 PM 
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral 
> > 
> > 
> > > Just thought that I would jump in here really quickly about the plane. 
> > > Even 
> > > though I haven't gotten to fly my Integral yet I must say that I have been 
> > > very happy with the overall construction of the model. It seems pretty 
> > > well 
> > > built and the two that I have are super light. With a typical Hacker setup 
> > > 
> > > C-50 14XL Comp 
> > > Hacker 99spin controller 
> > > Thunder Power 10s1p 5000 mah 
> > > Thunder Power 2cell 730 mah receiver pack 
> > > Duralite regulator 
> > > 1-Futaba 9155 for the rudder 
> > > 2-Futaba 9550's for the ailerons 
> > > 2-Futaba 9650's for the elevator 
> > > 
> > > Mine have come in right at 10 pounds 10oz. I feel that this is good 
> > > considering the new TP packs are a little heavier then the old 5300's. 
> > > 
> > > Hope to have them flying shortly and will get back with the list and let 
> > > everyone know how they fly. 
> > > 
> > > Andrew Jesky 
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "John Pavlick" 
> > > To: "NSRCA Mailing List" 
> > > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:18 PM 
> > > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >> Ed, 
> > >> Well either it's really GOOD and nobody wants to let you in on the secret 
> > >> or 
> > >> it's NOT so good and everyone is trying to be politically correct. 
> > >> Why 
> > >> not just order a Black Magic? No secret there! You can probably have it 
> > >> built in time to fly this season. Never mind that composite stuff - get 
> > >> some 
> > >> wood! 
> > >> 
> > >> John Pavlick 
> > >> http://www.idseng.com 
> > >> 
> > >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > >> From: "Ed Miller" 
> > >> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" 
> > >> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 6:01 AM 
> > >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >>> Yes, I asked the question and haven't received any responses. I thought 
> > >>> by 
> > >>> now there would be more than a few Integral's out there flying. 
> > >>> Ed M. 
> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > >>> From: "colin chariandy" 
> > >>> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" 
> > >>> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 9:21 PM 
> > >>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>>>I think someone on the list asked about the peformance of the Integral 
> > >>>>and 
> > >>>>there has been no responce. 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> So...anyone got one yet? 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> How is the build and how does it fly with glow power? 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Colin. 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> --------------------------------- 
> > >>>> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email 
> > >>>> the 
> > >>>> boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>>> _______________________________________________ 
> > >>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> > >>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> > >>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> > >>> 
> > >>> _______________________________________________ 
> > >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> > >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> > >>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> > >> 
> > >> _______________________________________________ 
> > >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> > >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> > >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> > > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070515/1e2dfad2/attachment.html