[NSRCA-discussion] NATS discussions (was Rule 8.1.1)

Ken Thompson mrandmrst at comcast.net
Tue May 1 15:57:50 AKDT 2007


Dang Fred,

I hadn't thought of that, maybe I should add that to my list of goals;-)
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Fred Huber 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 6:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS discussions (was Rule 8.1.1)


  I may try to fly at the NATS next year....  If I do, my goal will be to come home with my plane still flyable.  Anything more than that will be a bonus.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Ken Thompson 
    To: NSRCA Mailing List 
    Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 5:36 PM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS discussions (was Rule 8.1.1)


    Oh man...I have to ask, your transmitter was on the ground why?  I'm sorry, I had no right to ask that question...I'll go back to my corner now...

    I'm glad this has turned to a NATS discussion and away from the original.  This year will be my first NATS...my goal is to not embarrass myself, that's it, no sense setting the goal too high.  I've flown in a bunch of local contests, the intense nervous thing isn't a problem any longer, however, I am fully aware that my first time stepping in front of the judges at the NATS is going to be a real issue.  My goal for my first NATS is to have fun, meet a ton of people that I've only talked to online or read about, and come away having learned a few things.  Those goals are completely achievable, and those goals I will achieve.

    Ken
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Rick Sweeney 
      To: NSRCA Mailing List 
      Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:44 PM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS discussions (was Rule 8.1.1)


      Also the year that Verne Keoster ran over my tansmitter with his van, was one I will not soon forget, and it was 10 years or so ago...


      On 5/1/07, Rick Sweeney <bacabbey at gmail.com> wrote: 
        My first NATS experience was the last year that they had the BIG TOP with all events going on at the same time. Looking back, I am glad that I had the opportunity to attend that year as going forward the Pattern NATS always seemed a bit barren to me, not much going on. I will never forget watching a Pylon racer practice at one of the practice fields, going by hotel rooms filled with competitors working on helicopters, contol line planes, kids dusted after a long hot day in the sun competing. Something was always going on. I had never seen FAI Pylon, speed, and have not since. It was one of the most memorable NATS that I ever attendid, other then the time I won..lol. 

        Rick Sweeney  


         
        On 5/1/07, Fred Huber <fhhuber at clearwire.net > wrote: 
          The only NATS I have attended was the time it was held at Olathe, Kansas (1968 or 1969?).  At that point the NATS were still able to be held in less than a month of flying competitions... and all sorts of events were being flown simultaneously.  I was just a kid, with a group of Cub Scouts, flying in the AMA Delta Dart competition. (because the Cub Scout leaders arranged for us to go)  It was more a field trip to get to see the other events though. 

          There's a "double edged sword" effect of flying many events at once.  You may have to pick and choose which to participate in if you desire to compete in several different events.  

          Sure, its nice for the spectators to be able to go from site to site and see many different aspects of aeromodeling all in one day.  But if you are actually competing in an event such as Pattern... you aren't going to be doing much spectating until you are done flying. 
            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: Bob Richards 
            To: NSRCA Mailing List 
            Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:03 PM
            Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

             
            Thanks, Tony, I was not aware of that.

            Part of the allure of attending the NATS as a competitor is (was) being able to observe the other modeling disciplines, such as pylon or CL combat. I guess it is nice in one way to have the whole site for pattern, but not having other events going on simultaneously is a bit of a bummer. It makes it less of a spectator draw. 

            Bob R.


            Tony Stillman <tony at radiosouthrc.com> wrote:
              No.  We have the Pattern Nats as a stand alone event, as we use all three flying sites at the same time.  That could change, by allowing some Control Line events, but the problem we have with aerobatics is that many times we over-fly the control line circles from the "Stage Center" site…  That would be a safety issue that we would have to somehow address…. 


              Tony Stillman, President
              Radio South
              3702 N. Pace Blvd
              Pensacola, FL 32505 
              1-800-962-7802
              www.radiosouthrc.com 


------------------------------------------------------------------

              From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org ] On Behalf Of Bob Richards
              Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 10:04 AM
              To: NSRCA Mailing List 
              Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

              Buddy,

              Actually, the NSRCA share might be less than what you say. Don't they hold multiple events simultaneously? I have not been to Muncie yet, but both times I was at Lawrenceville that was the case. 

              Bob R.





--------------------------------------------------------------------


            _______________________________________________
            NSRCA-discussion mailing list
            NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
            http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 


--------------------------------------------------------------------


            No virus found in this incoming message.
            Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
            Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/782 - Release Date: 5/1/2007 2:10 AM








          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 







--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
    Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/782 - Release Date: 5/1/2007 2:10 AM



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070501/f7c8e04d/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list