[NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: Electric Weight ProposalLogic andRationale

[Derek Koopowitz]

So Del... can we sign you back up again now that they're scored again?  ;)

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del K. Rykert
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:02 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: Electric Weight ProposalLogic
andRationale


Amen..!!! and one of the few reasons I left NSRCA..   
 
        Del 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Gray E  <mailto:gfowler at raytheon.com> Fowler 
To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: Electric Weight Proposal Logic
andRationale


Leave the weight limit rule alone.  The proposal impacts more than what
appears up front. Electric planes CAN be built much lighter for several
reasons and soon batteries will be lighter. 
I now hope that once the masses have spoken, that a private proposal does
not go forth on this subject. That is how we ended up not judging TO/L for 2
years even though 75% of the people wanted to keep juding TO/L. 



Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radomes and Specialty Apetures
Technical Staff Composites Engineering
Raytheon 



  _____  




_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070622/43b879f4/attachment.html