[NSRCA-discussion] Nats registration

Derek Koopowitz derekkoopowitz at gmail.com
Wed Jun 13 14:51:18 AKDT 2007


Provided that the Intermediate pilots aren't qualified to judge Advanced,
right?  And since there are 20 Intermediate pilots they can help out with
judging Advanced as well - since everyone has to be certified.

On 6/13/07, Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>
> As a former Nats event director, I must point out that the Master class
> pilots are used to judge the Advanced AND F3A pilots, thus the problem with
> the number of Master class pilots.  If you use three judges on both Advanced
> lines, that's six judges each session.  Then, if there are four F3A lines,
> that's another twelve judges.  So, the first two sessions of Advanced and
> F3A requires 36 Master class judges.   Oh oh! we run out of Master class
> judges on the third day if we only have 40 Master class pilots and nobody
> volunteers to judge extra sessions.  That's why Dave Guerin's hair is
> turning gray/falling out.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
>  On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
>
>  And for one year there will actually be enough judges to judge Masters -
> we've always struggled with not having enough F3A pilots to fill the Masters
> judging pool.
>
>
>
> On 6/13/07, Jim Woodward <Jim.Woodward at armorholdings.com> wrote:
> >
> >  Wow – Awesome!  The Masters pilots will get a taste of judging a highly
> > attended FAI class!  J J J
> >
> >
> >
> > Jim W.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> > ] *On Behalf Of *Derek Koopowitz
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 13, 2007 12:41 PM
> > *To:* NSRCA Mailing List; dist7 at nsrca.org
> > *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] Nats registration
> >
> >
> >
> > It looks like we have 115 total registered pilots for the Nats this year
> > (from the AMA website)...
> >
> >
> >
> > Intermediate - 20
> >
> > Advanced - 16
> >
> > Masters - 40
> >
> > FAI - 39
> >
> >
> >
> > Those are excellent #'s and I'm hoping that there will still be some
> > late entries that will raise those numbers even more.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070613/8405cfc8/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list