[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Masters Sequence for 2009/2010
Doug Cronkhite
seefo at san.rr.com
Thu Jul 26 19:00:20 AKDT 2007
I completely agree Dave.
Reducing the flight time per sequence does a couple things..
1) Allows more rounds to be flown. Makes pilots happy.
2) Reduces the workload for the judges. Makes judges happy & makes
pilots happy. A judge who's workload is reduced can focus better over
the course of a day.
-Doug
Dave Lockhart wrote:
> Doug,
>
> The gist of one of the conversations was to the effect of
>
> Q - "Won't that put an un-needed demand on electrics?"
>
> A - "Screw the electrics!!!"
>
> Idea being the schedule shouldn't cater to any type of plane, powerplant, or
> flying style.
>
> At this point, my personal opinion is that reducing the length of the
> Masters schedule would be a good thing - for all the same reasons F3A has
> gone that route - mostly reduced flight time - I know as a judge at local
> contests, I would very much appreciate it!!!
>
> Dave
>
>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list