[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Masters Sequence for 2009/2010

[Dave Lockhart]

Doug,

The gist of one of the conversations was to the effect of

Q - "Won't that put an un-needed demand on electrics?"

A - "Screw the electrics!!!"

Idea being the schedule shouldn't cater to any type of plane, powerplant, or
flying style.

At this point, my personal opinion is that reducing the length of the
Masters schedule would be a good thing - for all the same reasons F3A has
gone that route - mostly reduced flight time - I know as a judge at local
contests, I would very much appreciate it!!!

Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
seefo at san.rr.com
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:22 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Masters Sequence for 2009/2010

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the idea of reducing the number 
of maneuvers was simply to reduce the time in the box per pilot. I 
think the benefit to electrics was just a byproduct of that idea.

-Doug

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion