[NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models

[Terry Brox]

Hi Steve,
         What is your email addy? I think there has been some talk of SPA in Nebraska, or at one time there was.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Steve Byrum 
  To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' 
  Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:32 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models


  Terry



  Please email me off list.  There is rapidly growing SPA interest Arkansas.



  Steve Byrum 

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Terry Brox
  Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:24 AM
  To: NSRCA Mailing List
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models



  Our club once held what was called a retro pattern contest. We used an old rule  book from around 1981 if memory serves correctly. We just stayed with everything as it was described.  The only issue I have with

  SPA is you cannot equip all planes as they were originally designed and flown. Another thing is, I wish I were closer to the Southeast so I can participate in SPA activities.  Terry

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Earl Haury 

    To: NSRCA Mailing List 

    Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:40 AM

    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models



    Interesting indeed - a local club is considering holding a "ole fashion" pattern contest this fall. The plan is to fly pre-turnaround pattern. Not sure exactly what the rules will be - but not SPA, as the intent is to allow '70's - '80's airplanes with piped engines & retracts (one member mentioned a Brushfire with piped Jett 90). 



    I'm very comfortable with pattern as it is - however, there is a gap between current pattern and SPA that many seem interested in.



    Earl

      ----- Original Message ----- 

      From: Koenig, Tom 

      To: NSRCA Mailing List 

      Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 7:16 PM

      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models



      Guys-there are many of us that reminisce about the 'simpler' days of the 60 size models, even down here!



      I mentioned recently to some locals that I may hold a comp similar to your SPA stuff. I considered just allowing 60 size models as a max, never mind all the vintage rules etc.....I was SWAMPED with interest. There were all sorts of ex pattern pilots ready to show up. I think I'd have had 40 -50 possible entries!!!



      Not trying to stir things up-but it is interesting nonetheless.



      Tom



        -----Original Message-----
        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ron Lockhart
        Sent: Thursday, 4 January 2007 11:31 AM
        To: NSRCA Mailing List
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models

        Yea, smaller has a number of advantages.   

         A reduction in money, time, hassle factor, etc., of models is a thought toward increased participation.

        (Yea, I know the established pilots, and new pilots, are allowed to fly smaller models right now.  But we have a 

        lot of history  that shows Dean's comment "Given that everyone will build or buy up to the maximum size limit" is true.

        How does that Dixie thing go?....<G>



        Ron Lockhart



          ----- Original Message ----- 

          From: Dean Pappas 

          To: NSRCA Mailing List 

          Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:51 PM

          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Header Brace



          Hi John,

          A year or so ago, I puit together an Excelleron 90 for a review and eventual sale to a newbie.

          Boy! Was it nice to drop a plane into the minivan in one piece!

          It was almost as good as when a Phoenix 8 would fit into the back of a hatchback Camaro in one piece.



          Given that everyone will build or buy up to the maximum size limit,

          is there a good enough reason to push on the rules bodies to legislate Pattern plane sizes back down?

          How about 1.6 or 1.7 meters square?

          Will this affect cost and complexity enough to have a beneficial effect on participation?

          Or am I just whistling Dixie?



          later,

          Dean

          Dean Pappas 
          Sr. Design Engineer 
          Kodeos Communications 
          111 Corporate Blvd. 
          South Plainfield, N.J. 07080 
          (908) 222-7817 phone 
          (908) 222-2392 fax 
          d.pappas at kodeos.com 

            -----Original Message-----
            From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of John Ferrell
            Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 3:07 PM
            To: NSRCA Mailing List
            Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Header Brace

            There seems to be a growing trend toward smaller airplanes among a lot of folks. I sure am enjoying the 90 size Boxer I bought from Ed Miller last summer. Less hassle to transport, assemble and fly. That means I can fly more!



            John Ferrell    W8CCW
            "My Competition is not my enemy"
            http://DixieNC.US




----------------------------------------------------------------------

          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

            ************************************************************************
            *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
            be confidential. If received in error, please delete all 
            copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or 
            dissemination of this email or its attachments is 
            prohibited without the consent of the sender.

            WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
            outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty 
            is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. 
            Before opening or using attachments, please check for 
            viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any 
            affected attachments.

            Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
            individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
            and with authority, states them to be the views of the 
            organisation.
            ************************************************************************
           


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.16.4/615 - Release Date: 1/3/2007



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.16.4/615 - Release Date: 1/3/2007
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070104/401368de/attachment-0001.html