[NSRCA-discussion] LiPO Receiver packs
Fred Huber
fhhuber at clearwire.net
Wed Jan 3 20:06:52 AKST 2007
double paks and regulators is fine... but the added reliability can lead to added complacancy about checking the LiPos before each flight.
#1 source of reliability is proper pre-flight.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Lockhart
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] LiPO Receiver packs
Colin,
Any non-redundant component that fails can kill the plane.
A very simple way to avoid single components in the power system is to double them -
TP2s1p480 #1 into Vreg#1 into RX battery port
TP2s1p480 #2 into Vreg#2 into RX spare channel port.
With the Tech Aero Vregs I'm using, the total weight is only 3 oz. I am not using switches, as the plane is electric and I am "under the hood" each flight anyway. If you want to use a switch, just use 2.
You can pretty effectively monitor lipo health with a voltmeter with a switchable load. Check the voltage after each flight, and you'll probably see a fairly consistent drop in resting voltage after each flight. Apply the load and you should see a fairly consistent drop in voltage. When the lipos get old, the voltage drop per flight will increase, and the amount of voltage drop under load will also increase.
Regards,
Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of colin chariandy
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 10:06 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] LiPO Receiver packs
Thanks Jason.
What about reliablity? How do these batteries fail? Is it detectable before it's too late?
Is there a not too expensive charger ( not the 10101) that can be used to minitor the LiPO condition?
I have been using SR batteries forever and I have learned how these batteries fail. As a result it's easy to avoid the failure in the air. How do you plan to ensure that the LiPOs don't fail in the plane?
Colin.
JShulman <jshulman at cfl.rr.com> wrote:
With my new Integral with the OS-200/YS-160, I am running a TP-910 2-cell lipo with a Shulman Aviation 6V regulator. After 3 flights, I put in 380 mah's. I would imagine on a 2C it might be a bit better.
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of colin chariandy
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:51 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] LiPO Reciever packs
Hi all
Just trying to get some background on the use of LiPOs for reciever packs.
What are you guys using...2 cell, 3 cells?
Which regulators do you recommend?
How do you monitor performance?
How reliable are they in a 2C airplane?
Appreciate any advice.
Thanks
Colin.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.16.4/615 - Release Date: 1/3/2007
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070104/8bff2efc/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list