[NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models

Wed Jan 3 16:40:55 AKST 2007

I think there would be a lot of interest. There seems to be a lot of ARFs and kits this size
  availabe also, more than the 2 meter size. Just from personal experience there is a tremendous cost savings in putting a 90 size together versus a 2 meter.

  tommy s

"Koenig, Tom" <Tom.Koenig at actewagl.com.au> wrote:
      v\:* {   BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)  }  o\:* {   BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)  }  w\:* {   BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)  }  .shape {   BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)  }      st1\:* {   BEHAVIOR: url(#default#ieooui)  }      @font-face {   font-family: Tahoma;  }  @page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; }  P.MsoNormal {   FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"  }  LI.MsoNormal {   FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"  }  DIV.MsoNormal {   FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"  }  A:link {   COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline  }  SPAN.MsoHyperlink {   COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline  }  A:visited {   COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline  }  SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {   COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline  }  P {   FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;
 mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto  }  SPAN.EmailStyle17 {   COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-style-type: personal  }  SPAN.EmailStyle19 {   COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-style-type: personal-reply  }  DIV.Section1 {   page: Section1  }      Guys-there are many of us that reminisce about the 'simpler' days of the 60 size models, even down here!

  I mentioned recently to some locals that I may hold a comp similar to your SPA stuff. I considered just allowing 60 size models as a max, never mind all the vintage rules etc.....I was SWAMPED with interest. There were all sorts of ex pattern pilots ready to show up. I think I'd have had 40 -50 possible entries!!!

  Not trying to stir things up-but it is interesting nonetheless.

  Tom

    -----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ron Lockhart
Sent: Thursday, 4 January 2007 11:31 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models

  Yea, smaller has a number of advantages.   
   A reduction in money, time, hassle factor, etc., of models is a thought toward increased participation.
  (Yea, I know the established pilots, and new pilots, are allowed to fly smaller models right now.  But we have a 
  lot of history  that shows Dean's comment "Given that everyone will build or buy up to the maximum size limit" is true.
  How does that Dixie thing go?....<G>

  Ron Lockhart

    ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dean Pappas 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:51 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Header Brace

  Hi John,
  A year or so ago, I puit together an Excelleron 90 for a review and eventual sale to a newbie.
  Boy! Was it nice to drop a plane into the minivan in one piece!
  It was almost as good as when a Phoenix 8 would fit into the back of a hatchback Camaro in one piece.

  Given that everyone will build or buy up to the maximum size limit,
  is there a good enough reason to push on the rules bodies to legislate Pattern plane sizes back down?
  How about 1.6 or 1.7 meters square?
  Will this affect cost and complexity enough to have a beneficial effect on participation?
  Or am I just whistling Dixie?

  later,
  Dean
  Dean Pappas 
Sr. Design Engineer 
Kodeos Communications 
111 Corporate Blvd. 
South Plainfield, N.J. 07080 
(908) 222-7817 phone 
(908) 222-2392 fax 
d.pappas at kodeos.com 
    -----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of John Ferrell
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 3:07 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Header Brace

  There seems to be a growing trend toward smaller airplanes among a lot of folks. I sure am enjoying the 90 size Boxer I bought from Ed Miller last summer. Less hassle to transport, assemble and fly. That means I can fly more!

  John Ferrell    W8CCW
"My Competition is not my enemy"
http://DixieNC.US

---------------------------------

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion        ************************************************************************
*PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
be confidential. If received in error, please delete all 
copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or 
dissemination of this email or its attachments is 
prohibited without the consent of the sender.

WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty 
is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. 
Before opening or using attachments, please check for 
viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any 
affected attachments.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
and with authority, states them to be the views of the 
organisation.
************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070104/31d18c3a/attachment.html 