[NSRCA-discussion] NSRCA Dues Increase
Wayne
Whinkle1024 at msn.com
Tue Jan 2 19:44:36 AKST 2007
Well said Del
As I mentioned and everyone went off on me. Its not the extra $10. Its the
fact there is no plan for the future and no way to pay the bills. We are
short on funds so we need to increase dues. To me this only means dumping
more money into an already deep hole. The NSRCA management over the last 2-4
years has spent in the range of $25,000 more than its income. Not pointing a
finger and saying where did it go? and then shaming folks into just sending
the extra $10 is not going to solve the problem.
Derek can speak directly to the funds issue as he reported the funds in
excess back beofre Lamar was elected to office. I got the number directly
from the debate on email regarding the finacial issues and address questions
to canidates that I believe Troy Neuman posted 2 years ago. These numbers
jive with Rusty Dose's last column where he states dues and advertising is
down $15,000 per year. Guess what do this for 2 years and there is your
$25k.
This is not a call to stop renewing. Rather its a vote of no confidence in
the current method. Not the people just the fact we are dumping money down
the drain.
I voice my opinion and the world explodes in that I don't know what I'm
talking about. Guess what THAT is the ARROGANT, Elitist attitude that we
pattern flyers are so famous for.
I have copies of old KF's that were nothing more than Xerox sheets like a
normal club news letter. The content was 10 times what it is today. Yet it
probably cost about 1/4 the price to produce.
The KF used to attract folks because it was the place to get info and
contacts for all the cool pattern stuff. Not because it had a fancy cover in
color. Well the internet, and direct mail marketing ads from Central Hobby
and others now give this information to us. I would rather see us spend our
money on a professional website that has info, how to's, ads, and real time
information other than the local weather report every month from the DVPs
that is costing us thousands.
My suggestion is to stop producing a published news letter. Instead continue
it as an online publication and spend our money on the website and have some
professional help in setting it up, marketing our shirts, caps and patches,
and get back to what the NSRCA does well. Promote pattern instead of
producing a poor publication.
Get in bed with Flying Giants and create a online "pattern flyer central"
Like IMAC has done. They have a good product and the cost is half the price.
In fact they are doing so good at it people think they are us. How many
times do we see the internet light up with I would like to fly pattern and
want to get started but I only have 50cc yak and I don't want to get laughed
at. A good website and some positive support that can pool us the members
and keep a archive of the great techniques and articles that are written.
We can't compete with MA News, FLY RC and others so why try. We are who we
are and its time to cut back and tighten the belt. If we devote even 1/2 the
funds from our current poor KF to a good website we will much better off for
the long haul. I know the website is work but we have volunteers doing it
and the results are not competitive. Hell we can't even get D1 and D6 to put
their websites on the national site. Then we can't get D8 to update the
contests on the National site they have to go to D8's site to get the
contest. Come on lets get a united front that looks like we aren't just a
bunch of hillbillies! That is why IMAC has the coverage in the magazines,
that is why IMAC has suppliers like H9 including decals in the kits and
membership apps. That is why they are sound financially. We just sit around
and argue why a snap isn't a snap and don't want anyone to touch our
precious news letter that is trying to be a full magazine. Volunteers make
this organization go round. Well gets get them focus on what needs to
happen. Asleep at the wheel will not solve it. We have had that for the past
several years.
Wayne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Del K. Rykert" <drykert2 at rochester.rr.com>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NSRCA Dues Increase
> First I think we have to ask ourselves do we need or want to keep the
> casual
> competitors involved?
>
> My thoughts are if the NSRCA wants to encourage or cater to the casual
> competitors they have to change their mind set. As it stands they
> discourage
> and have driven away most of the casual pattern flyers. In my mind that is
> the biggest pool of people to build from as others are happy in their
> competitive niches they have found.
>
> 1. Nats competitors pay / class. If a class has finals and flyoffs why
> should Intermediate and Advanced help foot the bill? Prorate the
> registration fee based on class and potential number of flights that
> competitor could fly if they are superb flyer. Masters and FAI pay a
> higher
> fee than Intermediate and Advanced. They require more work and cost more
> to
> the organization to do thus should pay a fairer share of the Nats.
>
> 2. Competitors that do belong to NSRCA should get a price reduction of
> at least $5.00 at local meets and maybe $10.00 at Nats.
>
> 3. People who are qualified NSRCA judges should be automatically
> entered
> to win a significant door/entry prize providing they do judge a minimum of
> 1
> round. Would love to give them price break also for making the extra
> effort
> to be competent judge but feel that's to big a headache to do.
>
> Those that don't want to support the NSRCA and all the hard work that
> is
> done to promote and help the SIG shouldn't get a free ride.
>
> To late to go back, but changes that make it harder for the casual
> flyer
> to participate are going to keep or drive them away. Whether demands in
> time/money/obsolete equipment, all take their toll. Schedules in lower
> classes should only be changed every 3 years. Easier on judges and causal
> competitors. Many of my friends over the years that have left have been
> casual competitors and time demands took them away from the sport. If
> NSRCA
> wants to stay focused on being the best and most competent flyers only
> then
> stay the course. My feeling is the Sportsman, Intermediate and Advanced
> that
> shouldn't be the case. I would even prefer a ban of any sort of
> sponsorship
> in these classes also.
>
> If you care to reply directly to not clog the list with my banter.
> Del K. Rykert
> E-mail Address(es):
> drykert2 at rochester.rr.com
>
> If you have something constructive that may be enlightening to the group
> please respond to the list. Myopic views aren't seeing the problem. Think
> of
> the poor schmuck who has no coach, no pattern club or pattern flyers to
> use
> as a support network. Then think what they have to address to enter and
> play
> in this SIG. Then maybe.. just MAYBE you can understand the whole issue
> and
> picture from the perspective I am trying to convey.
>
> This is purely meant as food for thought and not attacking anyone's great
> work or efforts to date leading and promoting the sport. I am not
> suggesting
> this changes will be agreeable or practical to all but my view is it
> should
> help the casual competitor if this SIG would like to encourage and keep
> some
> of them as they do help support with their judging time, financial support
> to events that are barely drawing enough interest to keep contests on the
> schedule. Some clubs have dropped pattern event d/t lack of entrants.
> Clubs
> get tired of giving up and weekend and losing money to boot.
>
> Del
> nsrca - 473
> AMA - 8928
> kb2joi
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Kane" <getterflash at yahoo.com>
> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 2:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NSRCA Dues Increase
>
>
>> So what do you suggest?
>>
>> Bob Kane
>> getterflash at yahoo.com
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Del K. Rykert <drykert2 at rochester.rr.com>
>> To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 10:37:56 AM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NSRCA Dues Increase
>>
>>
>> Derek.
>> I believe the NSRCA should be looking at the last 10 years as the
>> measure to see how things are improving. Speaking in generalities this
>> SIG
>> has been in declining status for most part since this sport has become
>> dramatically more expensive and takes gobs more time to be involved in.
>> The
>> days of flying 40 size models are no longer viable. 60 size models are no
>> longer competitive. Competitors have to learn to be a competent judge as
>> well as a good mechanic / flyer and possibly builder if they choose to.
>> All these factors do force the realization that this sport is no
>> longer
>> willing to encourage or listen to the causal competitor.
>>
>> Del
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Derek Koopowitz" <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
>> To: "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Monday, December 25, 2006 12:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NSRCA Dues Increase
>>
>>
>>> Actually membership is up over the last couple of years but we do have a
>>> lot
>>> of work ahead of us - it will be challenging to all of us, not just the
>>> board, but for all members. One of my goals is to increase revenue with
>>> the
>>> K-Factor but I need someone for the Advertising Manager position - this
>>> person must be passionate about this sport and must be a good
>>> communicator -
>>> someone that can solicit new advertising to help build it up slowly. We
>>> did
>>> pick up a couple of new advertisers in 2006 - I think we can pick up a
>>> couple more new advertisers in the next few months. If anyone has an
>>> interest in being our Ad Manager please contact me ASAP.
>>>
>>> Wayne, I'm sorry to hear that you won't renew your membership -
>>> hopefully
>>> you'll change your mind in the near future. As to what I will do to get
>>> us
>>> out of this pickle? We ALL have to do something. This is not something
>>> that any one person can fix - if I could wave a magic wand, I would.
>>> We'll
>>> take the necessary steps on getting our finances in order - let me tell
>>> you
>>> that it won't take much to see a difference.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Wayne
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 6:17 PM
>>> To: NSRCA Mailing List
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NSRCA Dues Increase
>>>
>>> Don't worry Paul it wasn't announced in the KF either!
>>>
>>> So you didn't miss anything.
>>>
>>> I understand the need for increased dues. I also understand the need for
>>> the
>>> NSRCA to give us something in return for our support. Today I don't see
>>> much
>>> going on to PROMOTE pattern. While I wish to support pattern and promote
>>> it
>>> I will take my $40 and spend it on attendance at an event rather than
>>> the
>>> NSRCA.
>>>
>>> Sorry but poor management of more of our funds are not going to get it
>>> done.
>>>
>>> 2 years ago when folks asked questions of Derek and Lamar the bank
>>> account
>>> was sitting on a surplus of about $12,000 or so. If I remember the
>>> numbers
>>> correctly. I'm going to go find the old KF that had this number in it.
>>> Rusty
>>> Dose tells us last month that we are down over $15,000 is dues and
>>> advertising revenue. Looks to me like this has been a sinking ship for
>>> some
>>> time. The very fact that I received a renewal notice with the $40 price
>>> tag
>>> on it a full week before we heard about it from the board is another
>>> sign
>>> of
>>> mismanagement. A 30% increase in dues just because there has not been a
>>> increase in many years is not the solution to our problems. Where is the
>>> 30%
>>> increase going to help support precision aerobatics.
>>>
>>> I think that with all products and services in the market place today
>>> the
>>> NSRCA needs to show some value to the modelers out there. If this
>>> happens
>>> then membership will grow. Revenue will increase. And Pattern flying
>>> will
>>> prosper. I feel that I and other vote with our pocket books. The reason
>>> advertising dollars are down, the reason dues dollars are down is due
>>> directly to the product supplied.
>>>
>>> Perhaps the NSRCA leadership is listening but instead we talk about what
>>> a
>>> great job has been done and how far we have come. I'm not into bashing
>>> the
>>> guy that just left but Derek we have seen nothing about how to get us
>>> out
>>> of
>>> this pickle we are in. Therefore I elect not to renew at this time. I
>>> think
>>> there are better places to spend our money to support Precision
>>> Aerobatics.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Paul Brine" <pbrine at uoguelph.ca>
>>> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 3:19 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NSRCA Dues Increase
>>>
>>>
>>>> It also wasn't announced to the membership until Dec 22nd via Lamar's
>>>> email.
>>>> Remember not everyone (ie myself ) is in a position to download and
>>>> read
>>>> the
>>>> k-factor on-line.
>>>>
>>>> Applying the increase to those who renewed before then is like you
>>>> signing
>>>> on the line to buy a car and being told a week later by the dealer that
>>>> the
>>>> price went up a $1000.
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Martin X. Moleski, SJ <moleski at canisius.edu>
>>>> To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 1:07 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NSRCA Dues Increase
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Anthony Abdullah wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Silly quesion:
>>>>>
>>>>> > After a long pattern lay off for grad school and such I am returning
>>>>> > in
>>>>> > full force. Part of that included renewing my NSRCA membership. When
>>>>> > I
>>>>> > downloaded and printed the form from the NSRCA website the dues was
>>>>> > listed as $30.00 and that is how much the check was written for
>>>>> > (just
>>>>> > two days ago). Do I need to send an additional check for $10.00 or
>>>>> > is
>>>>> > the price increse effective Jan 1?
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a missed communication between Lamar and myself early in
>>>>> December, so I didn't hear about the change in dues until two or
>>>>> three days ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> The law is probably on your side, if you want to take the time
>>>>> to take it to court.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be a huge kindness to simply send along another $10 check.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe the forms have all been updated.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm hoping to work on the Paypal front end over this vacation.
>>>>> It hasn't been satisfactory for a couple of years ... my bad.
>>>>>
>>>>> Marty
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list