[NSRCA-discussion] Dist I Mini E Pattern after Pattern

[John Pavlick]

Come on - I was only kidding! Oh yeah, that's right, Ed flew the plane too. OK, maybe you're right...  Still, that is a sweet little plane. Now that the Berg 7 is available I'm going to lighten it up some more. I think I can get it close to 20 oz. RTF. That should be sweet!

John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: richard wallace 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Dist I Mini E Pattern after Pattern


  yeah, you're right - that was the biggest part of it ... but still! 


  On 2/14/07, John Pavlick <jpavlick at idseng.com> wrote: 
    Maybe it was just the pilot... <LOL>

    John Pavlick
    http://www.idseng.com
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: richard wallace 
      To: NSRCA Mailing List 
      Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 4:11 PM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Dist I Mini E Pattern after Pattern

       
      Seems like there was a 'rules discussion' afterwards that seemed to indicate that there ight be a need to have classes based on 'flat wing' and 'airfoiled wing' - based on the performance of one particular airplane that seemed like a really good idea. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070215/f5900630/attachment.html