[NSRCA-discussion] Food for thought

[John Gayer]

This sounds good to me as a compromise. From what I've seen, we are 
currently having difficulty getting enough competitiors for the classes 
we have now without adding another class.
John

vicenterc at comcast.net wrote:

> Claude,
>  
> Suggestion:  Why we don't call Expert = F3A and fly the P schedule 
> only in local contests?  The only change we will need to make is that  
> Expert = F3A becomes the last AMA class.  In other worlds, 
> Master should not be the terminal AMA class.  Adding another 
> class will add cost to the contest and probably will be longer to run. 
>  
> Regards,
>  
> --
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>  
>
>     -------------- Original message --------------
>     From: "Claude Weimer" <cweimer at tconl.com>
>
>     I have been thinking, it might be time to bring back the Expert
>     class.  The reason I say this is because the Masters class is
>     becoming rather large and is going to grow in the coming years.
>     The problems I see are the difficulty judging at local contests.
>      At the St Louis contest it took an hour and a half to judge
>     Masters.  Because Masters is the largest class compared the
>     Advanced and Intermediate and only three FAI, it can be difficult
>     to organize Judges for Masters.  I'm not singling out the St Louis
>     contest, the Omaha contest was the same as most contests I have
>     been to.  If Masters was split in two classes it would inc! rease
>     t he available people to judge.
>
>      
>
>     Masters could be a little easier and Expert could be harder.
>      Expert could even be the last FAI P schedule.  The reason some
>     don't wish to move to FAI is the time to learn two schedules.  It
>     looks like the Masters class is going to get larger and I think it
>     would be good to break it split it up.
>
>      
>
>     Claude Weimer
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> [NSRCA-discussion] Food for thought
> From:
> "Claude Weimer" <cweimer at tconl.com>
> Date:
> Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:33:59 +0000
> To:
> "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
> To:
> "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070828/c5d096e8/attachment.html