[NSRCA-discussion] [Fwd: Proposal]

[Del K. Rykert]

Hi Doug..
    
I concur and don't mean to infer that at all..  What I am attempting to do is to make more people realize that some decisions are made only to make it more interesting for themselves or their perception for the other people that come to compete at a contest. Course we are only addressing those that at least make the effort to show and support contests. 
 
What I am stating, I have heard repeatedly over the years  heard that many, including some of my friends, have not attended contests because of another new change in schedule, weather has been bad when they do have window to get out and still haven't flown a gallon of fuel for the new competition season. They refuse to make the expense in time and money when they still haven't checked their equipment let alone their reflexes honed to show up at a contest. Winning or being 3rd is not the issues. Doing fairly well by their own standards they set for themselves is. Work/family/weather all play a factor.  When the competition group is driving for the majority of the most competitive of the participants it leaves many of the casual competitors behind.  Is that what we truly want?  If we are going to address increasing the numbers that compete and possibly join the NSRCA if they don't have issues with the organization then my opinion is we don't need to cater to the few who are the most vocal about changes needed in the AMA classes...  When was last time anyone dropped out for lack of change..  Many have dropped out for not being able to keep up.. My contention is that many of those causal participants also help run contests and help bolster the numbers that compete at contest.. When some clubs have to stop offering for lack of participants then I say it needs looking at.  End of my thoughts on that. 
 
    Del

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <seefo at san.rr.com>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] [Fwd: Proposal]


> What exactly is a casual competitor? 
> 
> I'm being serious here. Someone who doesn't put in the time necessary 
> to be at their best cannot expect to win contests, and you certainly 
> cannot change the sport so these people CAN win. Most of us have other 
> things to do that take up our time. That's life. I can't practice every 
> day, but at the same time, I don't expect Quique, Andrew, or Jason, or 
> anyone else to make concessions to me because they can and do put in 
> the time.
> 
> A person who cannot devote the time necessary to be at the top of their 
> game, should have enough character and intelligence to accept that 
> fact. At that point they have 3 choices. 
> 
> 1) Compete and HAVE FUN at the level they can currently.
> 2) Devote more time and energy to the competition and get better.
> 3) Move on to something else.
> 
> People need to remember that competition is, and SHOULD BE unforgiving 
> of excuses.
> 
> -Doug 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Del K. Rykert" <drykert2 at rochester.rr.com>
> Date: Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:38 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] [Fwd: Proposal]
> To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
>> These are all great but, I see nothing changing to stop driving 
>> away the casual competitor. If the organization and sport wants to 
>> truly grow that area is long overdue. We need their numbers and 
>> help at fielding contests. 
>> 
>>    Del 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070824/c9830567/attachment.html