[NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

[rjo626 at aol.com]

     I believe it was brought up to get more people to the local meets. If you have to accumulate a said number of points to get into the NATS, you have to attend local meets to get the points. It's just to provoke thought. I don't think that it's a fantastic idea, but maybe some variation of that idea could be practical.
     RJO
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: BUDDYonRC at aol.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1


I have a question
Why all of a sudden are you talking about special requirements needed for 
Nat's entry.
My take on this, is if this is done we will reduce participation. I may be wrong but if I am not how is this going to help pattern and the NSRCA?
I think it will be the first step toward a further reduction in membership and a step toward an all professional Nat's 
 
Second question
Tony are you pushing this idea for real?  
Buddy 






See what's free at AOL.com. 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070428/5365b41f/attachment.html