[NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

[Archie Stafford]

Wayne,

This I have to disagree with.  I think the NATS is a great experience, even
if you are just going for fun.  There are a great number of guys who go just
to fly for fun, knowing they will not be competitive.  A good friend of mine
who was a Sportsman pilot last year went to the NATS with me and flew
Intermediate.  He finished about as low as he could finish, but had more fun
than about anyone I know.  It also significantly helped him for the rest of
the year in sportsman.  He no longer was nervous in front of judges and
such. He has moved up to Intermediate this year, but he had a lot of fun
doing it. 

Arch

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of wgalligan
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 7:47 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

I think if the pilot is good enough to fly Intermediate at the NATs level he

should stay in that class.
.02 worth...

WG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith Hoard" <khoard at gmail.com>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 7:22 AM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1


> Does Rule 8.1.1 apply to the Nats?  For instance, a Sportsman pilot
> goes to the Nats and flies in Intermediate because Sportsman is not
> offered.  Can said pilot go back to Sportsman after the Nats?
>
> -- 
>
> Keith Hoard
> Collierville, TN
> khoard at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion