[NSRCA-discussion] APPARENT GEOMETRY (PARALLAXED VIEW)

[Fred Huber]

Its always the judges' responsibility to score what they see.

The only questions that arise about that is if the judge is scoring by the 
book.  Hopefully the judges are properly trained for that.

Thus... we have judge training seminars. (which also aid the pilots because 
if they know what the judge is supposed to be looking for the pilot can be 
more aware of what their manuvers SHOULD look like)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lisa & Larry" <lld613 at psci.net>
To: "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] APPARENT GEOMETRY (PARALLAXED VIEW)


> It was said that the best pilots in the top classes don't seem to have a
> problem with the end of box maneuvers.
>
> I'm curious about opinions on this thought....
>
> The thought I have is how much of this is actually related to muscle 
> memory.
> Doesn't matter where the plane is if all radii inputs are the same and 
> roll
> inputs are the same. Once muscle memory is good, the separation of good 
> and
> great pilots is then wind correction which is also muscle memory and
> eye/hand coordination.
>
> Now, if you have seen me fly, you would think my straight lines were
> corrected to the earth's curvature...Not a whole lot is straight and I 
> have
> muscle memory lapses. VBG...
>
> If I'm correct, then the judges need to step up to properly score what 
> they
> see.
>
> Larry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of george w.
> kennie
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:46 PM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] APPARENT GEOMETRY (PARALLAXED VIEW)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <<<<<<<I, too, have been flying purposely flawed maneuvers, but, unlike
> Jason, mine don't give the impression of precision.>>>>>>>
>
> I experienced the exact same frustrations and after serious consideration
> have made the decision to just fly the maneuvers
> per the prescribed geometry as dictated by the rulebook as the purposeful
> flawing seems too stressful for my personality
> ( boy, speaking of something that's flawed).
> Me
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] APPARENT GEOMETRY (PARALLAXED VIEW)
>
>
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2007, at 4:52 PM, george w. kennie wrote:
>>
>>> <<<<<<The better pilots tend to fly purposely flawed maneuvers that
>>> give the impression of precision.>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>   Uh-Oh,.........the cat's out of the bag !   You've been found out
>>> Jason, you better be real careful.
>>
>>
>> I, too, have been flying purposely flawed maneuvers, but, unlike
>> Jason, mine don't give the impression of precision.
>>
>> Ron Van Putte
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.2.0/756 - Release Date: 4/10/2007 
> 10:44 PM
>