[NSRCA-discussion] cost of electric - now engine choice
Kelly Regan
kelly.regan2 at verizon.net
Wed Sep 20 16:17:31 AKDT 2006
Thank's guys... Once you see me fly you will understand that
"moving up to masters" was a great joke! I will be in
sportsman for a while!
You know some guys have JR on the sides of the planes...
Mine has WR.... Wrong Rudder! ;)
Mike:
Thank you for the plane recommendation.
I was offered a good deal on a previously owned but unbuilt Brio
and purchased it last month. For a practice plane I have a Showtime
with the throws dialed way down per Don Szcur's recommendation
in the pattern forum on RCU. I have a OS 1.20 4s in it.
Fred:
I hope I don't dumb thumb anything at a contest, that is one of my
biggest fears! However I did do that with my first 28% Edge.
John:
Concentrating on flying is exactly what I want to do. I don't want to fight
an engine to make it run reliably. I am torne between the 160 and 140.
The cost difference between the two is not really a problem. I just don't
want to get a 140 and wish I had a little more power. However there is
always 20% fuel.
Vicente:
Thank you for the incite on the gas engine. Weight is a concern as well as
longevity of the airframe. I am leaning toward the glow 160 or 140.
Joe:
User friendly is what I am after... you make a convincing argument for the
140. I would rather pay a couple hundred more then regret saving that
money
while fighting an engine. My only problem at this point is deciding
between the 2.
I have read great reports about both setups. The only thing bad I have
heard about
the 160 is that it can have a strange mid range with the perry pump?
What that means
I have no idea but it was told to me by someone that has been
around/designed
pattern planes for a while.
Thanks again for the help !
--
Kelly Regan
Visit the Georgetown Branch: http://mysite.verizon.net/vze6uror/
Freestate Aeromodelers: http://www.freestateaeromodelers.org/
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list