[NSRCA-discussion] berg 7 channel Rx

[Adam Glatt]

Heh, nope.  It's hard to take out the solution that I spent many scary 
flights and wasted practice days finding, and replace it with something 
that no one has used in the same equipment situation and found it to 
work great.  Now, if I didn't have a receiver and was looking at 
spending $200 on the JR model or $50 on the Castle model, I would buy 
the Castle and try it.

I actually bought a Berg 7p and Berg crystal for the Twister, but I 
stopped pattern flying after Muncie.  I probably would have tried it had 
I done more flying.

-Adam

Michael Wickizer wrote:
> Adam:
>
> You have one in the Twister yet?
>
>
>   
>> From: Adam Glatt <adam.g at sasktel.net>
>> Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] berg 7 channel Rx
>> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:56:30 -0600
>>
>> I've been using one for the last couple weeks in my 50", 31oz, electric
>> Edge 540.  Works great, solid unit, incredible features.  Basically, it
>> delivers better-than PCM features at $50.
>> -Adam
>>
>> Michael Wickizer wrote:
>>     
>>> Anybody have experience with these receivers?  At only 8 grams, sure 
>>>       
>> would
>>     
>>> be a weight savings in electric applications.
>>>
>>> http://www.castlecreations.com/products/berg_7-channel.html
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>