[NSRCA-discussion] Upgrade TX module and RX to the new 2.4GHztechnology
Grow Pattern
pattern4u at comcast.net
Thu Oct 19 14:38:43 AKDT 2006
Jay,
You have to buy a new receiver as well, so if you are right then each brand would have its own 2.4 GHz RX?
Regards,
Eric.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jay Marshall
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Upgrade TX module and RX to the new 2.4GHztechnology
I would think that since the replacement is just a RF module that all of the signal characteristics, polarity, rate, format, etc., for the different brands would remain intact and if they are not interchangeable now they wouldn't be in the future.
All of the pictures on their web page are "prototypes". They do mention that they had a public demo which is encouraging. Did anyone see it?
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Grow Pattern
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 4:47 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Upgrade TX module and RX to the new 2.4 GHztechnology
Keith,
I read all of the thread and all of the related threads on RCU and also the other discussion lists.
What I am asking is, "Has anyone on this list tried it out yet?"
I noted that the one replacement module was being made to fit a Futaba TX and a second version to fit a JR TX . I then wondered if either "brand" of RF module could then be used to lock into and drive one 2.4 GHz receiver? (Asked another way, "Would the associated 2.4 GHz receiver work with either radio?").
I also wondered if the "big two" were planning a module-and-receiver release of their own?
I have a boat-load of JR and Futaba TX's that all use plug in RF modules. A while ago I vowed not to buy any new radios until the RF link was redesigned and was much more robust than it is today.
I was also curious about any PCM functionality retention, vestigial properties or redundancy.
Not promoting the product - just asking..
Eric.
----- Original Message -----
From: Keith Hoard
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Upgrade tyo TXmodule and RX only to 2.4 GHz
There is alot of "smoke and mirrors" about this guy. . . read the whole thread on RCU.
On 10/19/06, Grow Pattern <pattern4u at comcast.net> wrote:
Have any of you tried this 2.4 GHz plug and play module system yet?
http://www.xtremepowersystems.net/xtremelink.php
Regards,
Eric.
JimDrew
Super Contributor
Posts: 33
Joined: 10/19/2005
From: Lake Havasu City, AZ, USA
Status: offline We are pleased to announce that we will be releasing
a new product in the near future that will allow you to upgrade you exiting
Futaba, JR, and Hitec radio systems to 2.4GHz.
Our system replaces the existing transmitter RF module and includes a
brand new receiver.
This is a professional upgrade, not a park flyer upgrade. Our system
offers up to 5 miles of range, no frequency conflicts, the ability to have
up to 390,000 people flying at the same time, and gives you the option of
having telemetry data.
Information and pictures of the prototype units are on our website.
http://www.xtremepowersystems.net/xtremelink.php
----- Original Message -----
From: "andrew" <andrewjesky at charter.net>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] full spectrum DX7
> Hey all,
>
> The new DX7 is pretty amazing. I have known about it for the past few
> months
> and just recently have seen it in use. I think the topper for the full
> range
> is not in any imac airplane, but in a jet. Last weekend at the Superman
> Jet
> show they were flying turbine powered jets very far away with no problems
> at
> all. They even had someone stand in front of the person flying to block
> the
> signal and still had no problem.
>
> In talking to some people that have used this new radio they say that the
> response time rivals the 14mz with 2048. I cannot wait to get one for
> myself
> and try it out. I think this is a big leap forward in the RC world as we
> will not have to worry about frequency control.
>
> Andrew
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Thompson" <mrandmrst at comcast.net>
> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] full spectrum DX7
>
>
>>I will be getting one of these when they come out. The big thing, will it
>> have the mixing capabilities that are used for Pattern...looks like it.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ed Alt" < ed_alt at hotmail.com>
>> To: <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>; <
>> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:12 AM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] full spectrum DX7
>>
>>
>>> Sounds like it. Aside from sailplanes, nothing gets further away than
>>> an
>>> IMAC plane being flown in Unlimited class, especially while doing a
>>> rolling
>>> circle. You wouln't dream of flying your pattern bird as far out as
>>> that.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>>>From: "Jay Marshall" < lightfoot at sc.rr.com>
>>>>Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>>To: < patternrules at earthlink.net>, "'NSRCA Mailing List'"
>>>><nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] full spectrum DX7
>>>>Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:31:49 -0400
>>>>
>>>>"big gas-powered IMAC planes"? Does this mean that we have left the
>>>>realm
>>>>of
>>>>the park flyer and have the range necessary for, perhaps, pattern?
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Steven
>>>>Maxwell
>>>>Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:13 AM
>>>>To: nsrca-discussion
>>>>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] full spectrum DX7
>>>>
>>>> Just got a news flash. Finally here
>>>>http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=SPM2710
>>>>
>>>>Steven Maxwell
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Try the next generation of search with Windows Live Search today!
>>> http://imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/searchlaunch/?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061019/d1c1597e/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list