[NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question-verticalsegments

Wed Oct 18 11:21:39 AKDT 2006

Thank you!! This has been flown away, I hope.

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
vicenterc at comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:15 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List; NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M"
question-verticalsegments

THE END....

Vicente "Vince" Bortone

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Don Ramsey" <don.ramsey at cox.net> 
I agree with Glen, the general rules must be followed as well as the
specific.  Each maneuver should not require each small detail be described.
Most are already over-defined causing many to not read the regs.  Done
properly, the general section should be large and the detail small.  All
centered maneuvers are generally symetrical around center.  A top hat at
center should have all line lengths equal.  A turnaround top hat may have
all line lengths different for positioning and altitude adjustment.  Same
for stall turns at center and turnaround stall turns.  All the statement
"The length of the vertical segments is not a judging criteria" means is the
performance of the model in vertical is not a grading criteria.  

In general, centered maneuvers that appear to be symetrical should be
symetrical.  Centered maneuvers that appear to begin and end at the same
altitude should, in fact, begin and end at the same altitude.  The figure
"M" is a symetrical maneuver around center with first roll directional
optional, stall turn direction optional,  inverted through the bottom half
loop, roll direction optional on the second vertical, vertical line lenght
the same as the first vertical, stall turn direction optional, upright exit
with overall height of the maneuver optional and all radii the same.  Much
of this is stated in the maneuver description but what is not specificed is:
radii must be the same, rolls must be in the center of the lines, the stall
turn has a maximum pivot radius of 1/2 wingspan, the roll rates are the
same, etc... That's the general section and it applies.

Don
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Glen <mailto:gwatson11 at houston.rr.com>  Watson 
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question
-verticalsegments

Keith,
Here is an interesting passage from the rule book page 77 regarding lines
within a maneuver.
"All lines within a maneuver have a beginning and end which define their
length. The length of a line should only be graded when a maneuver contains
several lines with a given relationship, as in a square loop. Unequal or
misrelated lines should be downgraded according to the severity of the
defect. One (1) point is subtracted for a reasonable difference. More points
are subtracted for greater differenc! es."
My take away is the maneuver description implies the vertical line length is
not a judge-able item however since there are two vertical lines their
length must be of the same reasonable length.
I for one am beginning to understand the importance of understanding not
just the individual maneuver description but also the general descriptions
and definitions the rule book provides like the above example.
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Keith Black
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 12:13 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question -
verticalsegments
Now that we're breaking this down, I'd like some clarification on the
section of the rule below that states:
"The length of the vertical segments is not a judging criteria."
In the strictest translation of this sentence I would say that this means
that the two stall turns do not need to be the same height, however, this
seems inconsistent will all other centered maneuvers where two halves of an
object do have to match in size.
A looser translation could be that the intention of this verbiage is to
point out that a shorter 'M' should score as well as a taller 'M', but
assumes that both sides should be the same height (which isn't stated
anywhere).
Unless otherwise clarified, I'd have to deduce that indeed the two stall
turns don't have to be the same height.
Keith Black
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glen Watson" <gwatson11 at houston.rr.com>
To: "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question

Below is the Figure M description from page 79-80 of the current AMA rule
book...Note the statement regarding rolls and stall turn direction are
pilot's option...I then found this statement "Edit page 79-80 Figure M with
¼ or ½ rolls" to include ¾ roll options" on the NSRCA page under:
http://nsrca.org/competition/judging/Patterns2007
Figure M with 1/4 or 1/2 Rolls: Model pulls up into one-quarter (1/4) loop
to a vertical track, hesitates then performs prescribed roll, hesitates then
executes a stall turn through 180 degrees, hesitates, performs
prescribed roll, hesitates then executes one-half (1/2) outside loop to
vertical track, hesitates, performs prescribed roll, hesitates, executes a
stall turn through 180 degrees, hesitates, performs prescribed roll,
hesitates then recovers with another one-quarter (1/4) loop to level flight.
Direction of rolls and stall turns are pilot's option. The length of the
vertical segments is not a judging criteria.
Downgrades:
1. Model not vertical at start and finish of rolls
and stall turns.
2. Stall turns not exactly 180 degrees.
3. Model does not execute prescribed rolls.
4. Rolls not centered in vertical lines.
5. Bottom of outside half loop not at same altitude
as entry and exit.
Regards,
Glen

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Budd
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:20 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question
Hi Jim,
Unless the maneuver has changed from 15 years ago all the rolls have
to be in the same direction, resulting in one stall turn being
canopy-facing you and the other being belly-facing you (your choice
as to which comes first).  It's a tough maneuver, especially when the
wind is blowing other than down the runway.
Jerry

>Bob
>  My memory crutch is,when flying from left to right, the 1st 2 roll
>directions are left-left and 2nd 2 roll directions are right-right.
>When flying from the right to left,the 1st 2 roll directions are
right-right
>and 2nd 2 roll directions are left-left.
>Like Arch said the center half  loop is inverted in both cases.
>Lotsa a upside down.
>
>Jim Ivey
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Archie Stafford" <rcpattern at stx.rr.com>
>To: "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:11 AM
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question
>
>
>>  Bob,
>>
>>  It has to be inverted.  The direction of roll must be the same on every
>3/4
>>  roll therefore you end up inverted across the middle.
>>
>>  Arch
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>>  [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Kane
>>  Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:53 AM
>>  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>  Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question
>>
>>  OK, I'm finally try to fly this thing with a pencil . . . . . .    one
>>  question I have (so far) is the 1/2 loop between the two stall turns in
>the
>>  figure M: Does it matter if it is an inside or outside half loop?  The
>>  aresti diagram posted on Flying Giants shows it as an outside half loop
>with
>>  no option.  Thanks.
>>
>>  Bob Kane
>>  getterflash at yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-- 
___________
Jerry Budd
Budd Engineering
(661) 722-5669 Voice/Fax
(661) 435-0358 Cell Phone
mailto:jerry at buddengineering.com
http://www.buddengineering.com <http://www.buddengineering.com/> 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061018/4bbb8bef/attachment-0001.html 