[NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question

dwaynenancy dwaynenancy at cox.net
Tue Oct 17 12:35:53 AKDT 2006


If you do it correctly the model will be in the same distance 
horizontally at entrance and exit. Dwayne

Mark Atwood wrote:

> There was never a requirement to roll the same way, and I would argue 
> that the presentation quality was all but equal when the maneuver is 
> flown well. It’s a very pretty routine when you nail it...especially 
> in a tough wind. BUT...as someone pointed out, there is NOT a 
> requirement to stall the same way (into the line of flight) but THAT 
> is where there is a huge “presentation” hit. Stall backwards...or 
> against the direction of flight really changes the look and flow of 
> the maneuver in a negative way. Also, when there is a head wind, one 
> can easily argue that the stall backwards (with the wind) is a 
> downgradeable stall as it’ll likely be more of a wingover.
>
> You only have to see this done correctly once to realize what a 10 
> should look like. It’s a crisp cool figure, with a million places to 
> go wrong.
>
>
> On 10/17/06 2:44 PM, "rcmaster199 at aol.com" <rcmaster199 at aol.com> wrote:
>
>     Mike, for me personally it was always easier to roll in same
>     direction for both stalls (one time you see canopy and the other,
>     undercarriage), and then use the correct rudder to stall in the
>     direction of flight. The other way, where you see either the top
>     or bottom on both stalls, requires the same rudder, but is much
>     more difficult to execute in my opinion. I suppose you could get
>     used to it tho.
>
>     Matt
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: kerlock at comcast.net
>     To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>     Sent: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 2:15 PM
>     Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question
>
>     Well, we need to get this one cleared up asap.....
>
>     Is rolling opposite to where you face the canopy both times legal,
>     or is it
>     a zero? Simple question. And if it's legal, we need to get that
>     info out
>     there quickly, because I know in less than 2 months we're flying
>     this one in
>     Florida for real.
>
>     -Mike
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *Check out the new AOL*
>     <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom%2Fnewaol>
>     . Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free
>     access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web,
>     free AOL Mail and more.
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     _______________________________________________
>     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.4/478 - Release Date: 10/17/2006
>  
>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list