[NSRCA-discussion] Computer rolls

[Ed Alt]

There's a IMAC type model of this flying already.  Flew at the NATS 
apparently. I think it was Baron Johnson's model.  Not sure how it passed 
the rules test for a model of something that has competed in IAC or is 
"known to be capable" of flying IAC sequences.  Can it be assumed to be 
capable, the proof being that the model performs well? You could go round & 
round on that one for a while I guess.

Anyway, if someone knows Baron, you could probably find out more about the 
elevator/rudder interference question.

Ed


>From: Bob Richards <bob at toprudder.com>
>Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Computer rolls
>Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 05:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Did anyone notice that it is possible for the tail surfaces to interfere 
>with one another?
>
>   Bob R.
>
>
>John Konneker <jlkonn at hotmail.com> wrote:
>   This link is to the Shark.
>Leo's last design.
>Never flown and now hangs in the EAA Museum in Oshkosh.
>http://www.troybuiltmodels.com/leo.wmv
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.  Get a free 90-day trial!
>http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwlo0050000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.windowsonecare.com/?sc_cid=msn_hotmail
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion