[NSRCA-discussion] One day contests

AtwoodDon at aol.com AtwoodDon at aol.com
Mon Oct 2 11:31:02 AKDT 2006


 
Then I am flying Sportsman at Creswell next year!!!!   
 
Don Atwood
 
In a message dated 10/2/2006 11:07:54 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
trexlesh at msn.com writes:

 
Everyone is correct about not trying it for intermediate...  It  would take 
too long.  The whole idea behind it is to get more flying time  for Sportsman 
pilots.  When I started flying pattern, I passed on flying  Sportsman and 
started in Intermediate, simply because I wasn't about to drive  350-500 miles to 
fly for 20 minutes....   Also, it's good exposure  for the Sportsman pilot to 
get as much flying time as possible in front of  judges...  They get a lot of 
feedback and support from the judges and  fellow flyers that they may well not 
get at there home field...
You learn more flying in a contest than you ever do just practicing  without 
observers.  So far, it's worked very well here in D8.  We  normally only get 3 
rounds per day any how....   To tell you the  truth, I don't believe we've 
had any issue on 2 day vs 1 day contests.   We always run a 2 day contest and 
the Sportsman get 12 rounds of  flying...    They like it!  
 
Rex Lesher

----- Original Message ----- 
From: _Adrien L  Terrenoire_ (mailto:amad2terry at juno.com)  
To: _nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org_ 
(mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org)   
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:16  AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] One day  contests


Lance: It IS workable, we have been doing it for the better  part of 20
years. Not for ALL classes, just Sportsman.
We make sure  this class gets 4 rounds each day, weather permitting, of
course. We  announce a winner Saturday night at the dinner, and present
the award. In  2005, for our 50th, we even gave away a gold watch to each
day's winners.  In this case, we stipulated that the same person could not
win both days.  The guy who won Saturday opted not to fly Sunday, but was
there  anyway.

You seem to missing the point that we are trying to  encourage
participation in the lower class, classes. We are doing this by  trying to
address the problem of committment for the newcomer. It does  work, and is
workable, if the CD looks at "how can we make it work" and  NOT at "how is
this a problem".

Terry T.

On Sun, 1 Oct 2006  21:24:59 -0500 "Lance Van Nostrand"
<_patterndude at comcast.net_ (mailto:patterndude at comcast.net) >  writes:
> As I read with interest this thread I don't see how 2 one  day 
> contests is 
> workable. sunday flying is not long enough  to have the same number 
> of 
> sportsman/intermediate rounds  and the obvious issue is that its 
> highly 
> likely that  people staying for two days are more likely to win on 
> both days.  
> Maybe a modification is just to announce a "day 1 placing" and let  
> the 
> contest continue.  Anyone only able to stay for  one day would win 
> the day 1 
> award and feel their  accomplishment for the time they were able to 
> compete. 
> At  the end of day 1, everyone has had the same number of rounds and 
>  
> opportunity to be winners.  The continuing dynamics can shake  things 
> up in 
> day 2, but at the end of day 1, the winners  can be announced.  Award 
> 
> something simple, like a  certificate or some diet coke and mentos at 
> the end 
> of day  1 flying.  People with time constraints are not limited to 
>  sportsman, 
> and this could be done at all classes.
> 
>  --lance
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kelly  Regan" <_kelly.regan2 at verizon.net_ 
(mailto:kelly.regan2 at verizon.net) >
>  To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <_nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org_ 
(mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org) >
>  Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 7:46 PM
> Subject: Re:  [NSRCA-discussion] One day contests
> 
> 
> > It was  nice to read all the opinions about the one day contest and 
>  I
> > have to say that 2 one day contests for the lower classes  seems
> > like a win win situation.
> >
> >  Speaking for myself I would not need or expect an award for a one 
>  day
> > contest.  Maybe you could save the award for the guys  that stayed 
> both
> > days and do a combined 2 day  total.  Or just print out paper 
> awards for
> > the  one day participants and mail them later?
> >
> > Day  one:
> > 1st
> > 2nd
> > 3rd
> >
>  > Day 2:
> > 1st
> > 2nd
> > 3rd
>  >
> > Combined total:
> > 1st
> > 2nd
>  > 3rd
> >
> > Again this is just an idea from a new  guy.
> >
> > Adrien L Terrenoire wrote:
> >>  In an earlier thread, I resopnded to a comment about our club 
>  making
> >> the Sportsman class two one day contest for as long  as I can 
> remember,
> >> and for the same length of  time, I can't remember anyone flying 
> just
> >> one of  the days. I am sure it has happened, but the instances 
> have
>  >> been rare. On our end, it means that we have to buy, or make up  
> and
> >> extra set of awards.
> >>
>  >> Terry T.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006  08:45:31 -0400 Mike Wizynajtys
> >> <_mikewiz at tcwireless.us_ (mailto:mikewiz at tcwireless.us)  
<_mailto:mikewiz at tcwireless.us_ (mailto:mikewiz at tcwireless.us) >>  writes:
> >>
> >>     That seems  reasonable. What if the only day you can attend is 
> the
>  >>     second day? Do contests allow that? I could  have done that 
> once
> >>     this  past summer, when a tight work deadline messed up my 
> plans.
>  >>
> >>     Wiz
>  >>
> >>     At 08:03 AM 9/29/2006, you  wrote:
> >>>     The obvious answer is to  only attend one day of a two day 
> event.
>  >>>     At the end of the first day, you pretty  much know how your 
> going
>  >>>     to stack up against the competition.  Which is the main 
> reason I
>  >>>     fly. For family reasons, I only attend  on saturday.
> >>>
> >>>
>  >>>         --------------  Original message --------------
>  >>>         From: Chris  Moon <_cjm767driver at hotmail.com_ 
(mailto:cjm767driver at hotmail.com) >
>  >>>         One day  contests really require a large number of 
> potential
>  >>>         flyers within a  reasonably short driving distance.  I 
> think
>  >>>         that they were  more popular years ago when there were 
> more
>  >>>         people in  pattern.  In the 80's on the East coast there 
> were
>  >>>         lots of flyers  and several one day contests.  Today, we 
> have
>  >>>         people driving  400 -500 miles to a 2 day contest and 
> that
>  >>>         would not be  good for a one day event.  However if you 
> had
>  >>>         enough local  people to make up for the loss of the long
>  >>>         distance  drivers maybe it would work.  I just don't know 
> of
>  >>>         too many areas  that have enough people local to make up 
> an
>  >>>         event and not  have to rely on long distance drivers to
>  >>>         guarantee a  good contest with lots of competition.
>  >>>         I would like  some one day contests too, but not if I am 
> only
>  >>>         flying a!  gainst 1 or 2 other guys.
> >>>>>
>  >>>>>              Chris
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>  >>  
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >> _NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org_ 
(mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org) 
>  >> _http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion_ 
(http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion) 
>  >
> > -- 
> >  ______________________________________________
> >
> >  Kelly Regan
> > _www.reganbrothers.com_ (http://www.reganbrothers.com/) 
> >  Home Page: _http://mysite.verizon.net/vze6uror/_ 
(http://mysite.verizon.net/vze6uror/) 
>  > ______________________________________________
> >
>  > _______________________________________________
> >  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > _NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org_ 
(mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org) 
>  > _http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion_ 
(http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion)   
> 
> _______________________________________________
>  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> _NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org_ 
(mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org) 
>  _http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion_ 
(http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion) 
>  
>  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion  mailing list
_NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org_ (mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org) 
_http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion_ 
(http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion) 




_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion  mailing  list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061002/3ec886a8/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list