[NSRCA-discussion] Brio 10 & high altitude

Bob Richards bob at toprudder.com
Tue May 23 06:14:17 AKDT 2006


Jeff,
   
  I don't really have any direct knowledge, but I will speculate on what I know from flying full-scale planes.
   
  The electric motor power will not change due to thinner air. However, the same size prop will spin faster due to the less dense air, which will let the motor unload more, which will result in less HP at the prop shaft. This will result in less performance.
   
  At the same time, the plane will have a higher stall speed since it will have to fly faster to produce the same lift in the thinner air.
   
  You will have to increase the prop size to maintain the same load on the motor. You could go up in diameter, or up in pitch, or a combination of both. My gut feeling is that you would need to go up at least one notch in pitch, since the plane will be flying faster. You might need to go up in diameter as well.
   
  Does Dave L repitch E props? :-)
   
  Oh, one other thing, if the outside temp is the same as when you fly at sea level, you will need to pay more attention to cooling air flow around (through) the motor and batteries. The less dense air will not cool as effectively.
   
  Bob R.
  

Jeff Hill <jh102649 at speakeasy.net> wrote:
  I'm getting ready to buy the motor, speed control and props for the 
Brio 10. Any ideas out there about which prop and motor combination 
will work best from 5000 to 7000 ft?

So far, I've reasoned that the motor will have the same power. So, in 
the less-dense air where I fly the rpms should go up or the motor 
should unload. However, it takes the same thrust to pull the Brio 
through its maneuvers unless airframe and lift drag decrease. That's 
as far as I've gotten.

Ideas please, thanks
Jeff Hill 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060523/94494dfc/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list