[NSRCA-discussion] Fuel line question-Data
Ron Lockhart
ronlock at comcast.net
Sat May 20 11:31:56 AKDT 2006
I agree.
This also agrees with some very rough testing I did a few years ago.
There were rumors that larger line would make a SuperTigre 2300 run better.
My rough tests showed medium line provided plenty of flow, and large line a bit better.
Changing to the large line on the engine made no noticable difference in practice.
Ron Lockhart
----- Original Message -----
From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fuel line question-Data
Vicente,
Chris' data is perfectly valid regardless of whether one uses a pump. It is simply the flow possible (maximum flow) in each type of fuel line under each level of pressure. You can standardize each flow in terms of ozs/min to see the differences the get a feel for the flow capacity under each set of conditions.
The whole point is that no Pattern engine uses anywhere near the flow capacity of each set of conditions tested. Therefore, a medium sized line will have the required capacity to feed the typical Pattern engine.
rgards
Matt
In a message dated 5/20/2006 7:43:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, vicenterc at comcast.net writes:
Can someone explain what the data means? I assume that is the time to move 14 oz out of the tank. In the first test, the tank is empty in 2 min 15 sec using the medium fuel line. The time is reduced to 1 min 30 sec using the large fuel line. As we can see the flow is very high compared to the actual flow we use. Around 14 oz in 10 minutes. Furthermore, we use fuel pumps so the actual difference in pressure drop are not affecting the motor. Therefore, I think this information is valid for non pumped engines. In other worlds, I don't think that the diameter of the fuel line will help too much in pumped engines unless the lines are very long. I don't think is the case in the standard set up we use for pattern.
Have a nice weekend,
Vicente Bortone
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Ron Lockhart" <ronlock at comcast.net>
Real data - great.
Thanks,
Ron Lockhart
----- Original Message -----
From: XCellHeli at aol.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fuel line question
Here is some tests I performed, you might find interesting. Chris
All filters were new.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060520/e2860098/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 40263 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060520/e2860098/attachment-0001.jpe
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list