[NSRCA-discussion] electric interference question

John Pavlick jpavlick at idseng.com
Sun May 14 19:00:37 AKDT 2006


I knew that would make you 'C' the light. :-)
  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ed Alt
  Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 9:34 PM
  To: NSRCA Mailing List
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] electric interference question


  Java is coffee, nothing more.  Or at least it should be. I'm so tired of
discovering what that language overcomplicates and limits.  Gimmee a 'C'!
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: John Pavlick
    To: NSRCA Mailing List
    Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 9:12 PM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] electric interference question


    Sure you can - write something in JAVA! <LOL>

    John Pavlick
    http://www.idseng.com


      -----Original Message-----
      From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ed Alt
      Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 10:48 AM
      To: NSRCA Mailing List
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] electric interference question


      Yep.  In fact, if you could generate a perfectly square wave edge, it
means that you are looking at an infinite number of sine wave frequency
harmonics of the fundamental freq all added together.  Just can't get away
from that analog stuff.  Very disturbing!

      Ed
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com
        To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 9:53 AM
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] electric interference question


        Digital signals are still subject to rise and fall time degradation.
Analog stuff within any segment of the signal. Always was. And still subject
to loss with distance.

        Any electrical component is subject to the Chemistry that created
it. Chemistry was, is and always will be analog. Drives Electrical Engineers
nuts. (VBG)

        Matt

        In a message dated 5/13/2006 11:30:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jpavlick at idseng.com writes:
          John Pavlick
          http://www.idseng.com/


          BTW - Any problem that can be solved with Ferrite beads is in fact
Black Magic. It's right up there with coiling the scope probe lead in the
opposite direction to get a cleaner signal. Who says this is a digital
world? <LOL>


------------------------------------------------------------------------


        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/339 - Release Date: 5/14/06
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060515/50dc5617/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list