[NSRCA-discussion] electric interference question

[John Pavlick]

Matt,
 I know, that's why I said that. Remember the silly ads on TV that said
"It's a digital world" ? WRONG! At my day job we build stuff that sends RGB
video 1500' over CAT 5 cable. All in the analog domain. I've seen stuff that
would scare the crap out of Marconi! Can you say "7-pole complex state
variable filter"?
John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com


  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
  Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 9:53 AM
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] electric interference question


  Digital signals are still subject to rise and fall time degradation.
Analog stuff within any segment of the signal. Always was. And still subject
to loss with distance.

  Any electrical component is subject to the Chemistry that created it.
Chemistry was, is and always will be analog. Drives Electrical Engineers
nuts. (VBG)

  Matt

  In a message dated 5/13/2006 11:30:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jpavlick at idseng.com writes:
    John Pavlick
    http://www.idseng.com/


    BTW - Any problem that can be solved with Ferrite beads is in fact Black
Magic. It's right up there with coiling the scope probe lead in the opposite
direction to get a cleaner signal. Who says this is a digital world? <LOL>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/339 - Release Date: 5/14/06
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060515/44139c99/attachment.html