[NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Advanced Schedule

[Joe Lachowski]

I think there was an equal amount at each level? If anything the majority of 
people involved were at the levels below Masters and FAI. Sequences were 
primarily developed by those in the same class with some random thoughts of 
wisdom thrown in by those long in the tooth to fine tune the sequences. 
There was also plenty of brainstorming done by all prior to creating the 
sequences to develop some very good guidelines as to what skill sets are to 
be developed at each level as well as boundaries. I'm sure Troy can provide 
those if you wish to see them. Sequences were also actively critiqued or 
test flown by all involved. These sequences were not the total work of 
Masters and FAI pilots as you seem to think. Troy can correct or expand on 
this, I'm sure.


>From: JonLowe at aol.com
>Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Advanced Schedule
>Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:11:55 EDT
>
>I wonder how many pilots, if any, below the masters/FAI level actively
>participated in making up the new patterns?  Any?  How about any who had 
>recently
>made the jump from Intermediate to Advanced or Advanced to Masters?  Just
>wondering.
>
>We can still fight this if we write our comp board district reps.  This
>really isn't an issue for the masters/FAI pilots. They are beyond this 
>point. This
>is an issue for the group coming up thru the ranks.
>
>Jon Lowe
>
>In a message dated 5/9/2006 9:00:18 PM Central Daylight Time,
>amad2terry at juno.com writes:
>Jon: I couldn't agree more!!!!!!!!!!! I fought this tooth and nail last
>year and caught a LOT of flack from Joe and Troy. I understand that they
>have to defend the positions they took, but you have hit the nail on the
>head. You willl not have seen an inverted entry or exit until you get the
>Masters!
>
>Terry T.
>
>
>


>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion