[NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Advanced Schedule

[Joe Lachowski]

This has been hashed around before. If you look more closely there is 
inverted flight work within the manuevers. IE triangle loop with roll. You 
don't have to have a pure inverted exit or entry from a manuever to get 
adequate experience with working in the inverted. I'll bet ya a million 
bucks that a lot of Advanced pilots will struggle with the triangle w/full 
roll.


>From: jonlowe at aol.com
>Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Advanced Schedule
>Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:08:20 -0400
>
>I've been looking at the 2007 advanced schedule, since it looks as
>though I will move up from Intermediate next year.  One thing that
>struck me is that the new Advanced schedule has NO inverted exits in
>it, down from 4 or 5 in the existing schedule.  As it stands, if the
>new schedule passes the contest board vote in June, the new
>Intermediate schedule will have one inverted exit, Advanced none, and
>Masters eight, if I counted right.  I'm not sure the degree of
>difficulty change between the schedules is what was contemplated.
>
>It may be that with the different options presented for the NSRCA
>survey, that we ended up with a harder intermediate pattern, an easier
>advanced, and a harder Masters, I'm not sure.  But now the change from
>Advanced to Masters will be huge, while the difference between
>Intermediate and Advanced is not so big anymore.
>
>It appears that the only thing that could be done now would be to
>encourage the contest board to vote down the new Advanced schedule
>since it is too late to update the proposal, if others feel the same
>way I do.  If it is voted down, then the old Advanced schedule would
>remain in place, as I understand it.  Each new schedule is a separate
>proposal, so they are voted upon separately.  The current Advanced
>schedule would appear to be a good transition from the new intermediate
>schedule, and would be hard enough that the new Masters schedule
>wouldn't be so intimidating.
>
>Comments?
>
>Jon Lowe
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion