[NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
Chad Northeast
chad at f3acanada.org
Tue Mar 28 21:01:25 AKST 2006
Jeff,
Its been done :)
http://www.plettenberg-motoren.com/german/zuxtra.htm
Chad
jeffghughes at comcast.net wrote:
> Matt,
> Your missing my point. I have never doubted that a "properly" designed
> duct can increase cooling. I just doubt that most modelers have
> "properly" designed duct work in their planes. The ducts we make
> increase cooling over not having any duct work, but I've built and
> flown a lot of planes with engines and motors un-cowled that didn't
> overheat either! My initial statement was around uncowled outrunner
> motors. Why not have them up front and exposed? Save a lot of grief
> and might just look good (or not, it just might look industrial). We
> as pattern folks always seem to do the harder right, instead of the
> easier right.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: rcmaster199 at aol.com
> Jeff, how do you increase air velocity around the motor with no
> increase in model airspeed?
> Here's where our old friend Bernoulli comes in, stage left.
>
> And BTW, the properly designed ENTRY into and EXIT from the
> ducting really increases the ducting efficiency.
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jeffghughes at comcast.net
> To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>; NSRCA
> Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:10:39 +0000
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
>
> While I agree good ducting can be better than hanging out there, I
> seriously doubt if most modelers do any better than hanging it
> out. Plus I think an outrunner all polished up woul look pretty
> cool with the fuse faired into it.
>
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: "Dean Pappas" <d.pappas at kodeos.com>
> Good ducting is better than hanging in the breeze, and a whole
> lot prettier.
>
> Dean Pappas
> Sr. Design Engineer
> Kodeos Communications
> 111 Corporate Blvd.
> South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
> (908) 222-7817 phone
> (908) 222-2392 fax
> d.pappas at kodeos.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]*On
> Behalf Of *jeffghughes at comcast.net
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:49 PM
> *To:* NSRCA Mailing List; NSRCA Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
>
> I was thinking about this the other day. Why don't we
> change the fuse design to stick the motor out in the
> breeze? Kind of like a WWI rotary or a foamy. Seems like
> we're trying hard to keep the planes identical in design
> between electrics and fuel for no apparent reasons
>
> Also now that huge props and braking are available, will
> fuselages slim down some?
>
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: "Dean Pappas" <d.pappas at kodeos.com>
>
> > Hi Earl,
> > This sounds a whole lot loke the similar duct I have
> placed around my AXI
> > outrunner.
> > It is astounding how much a difference a real
> cooling duct makes.
> > Fans inside the motor are a band-aid. The top-down
> solution is good airflow
> > management.
> >
> > The picture is of the ductwork in the Funtana I am
> doing for FM.
> > The subject is modifying the plane for
> high-performance electric. (high heat and
> > RF generation)
> > The airbox in the front of the cowl encloses the
> front of the motor,
> > and feeds the internals and the 1/8" gap in the duct
> with high pressure air.
> >
> >
> > later,
> > Dean
> >
> > Dean Pappas
> >
>
> Attached Message
> From: Dean Pappas <d.pappas at kodeos.com>
> To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:19:00 +0000
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion%40lists.nsrca.org>
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion%40lists.nsrca.org>
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
> From:
> rcmaster199 at aol.com
> Date:
> Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:14:17 +0000
> To:
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> To:
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list