[NSRCA-discussion] rookie judge

Sat Mar 25 07:48:49 AKST 2006

Whoever voted no for RCA-07-8 sure got it right. The justification was based on mother Nature (whom we cannot control) and penalizes those who handle changes. The pilots who take off left to right ALWAYS -even downwind, can now change after takeoff and land upwind FOR FREE. All this based on a few emotional diatribes that nobody challanged, but a few of us, and then when submitted realized that there was no penalty for a change that others flew through. At best they should lose points for not having the skill to handle what others are. Saving a plane is fine ,but it's your choice and you should pay an appropiate penalty for it!!!!!!!!!!!
Jerry
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Steven Maxwell 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 9:03 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] rookie judge

   The proposals are in and have passed a initial vote the only difference from the old way is the model doesn't have to stand still before the takeoff roll, so yes it will if passed by final vote scoring will be 0-10 in 1/2 point increments. RCA-07-02, RCA-07-09. There was only one vote against either of these proposals and that was district XI. This if passing the final vote will take effect on Jan.1 2007.
  http://www.modelaircraft.org/Comp/2007Proposals/RCAerobaticspattern.htm
  http://www.modelaircraft.org/Comp/2007Proposals/RCAvote.htm

  Steven Maxwell

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: 
    To: NSRCA Mailing List;NSRCA Mailing List
    Sent: 3/25/2006 8:42:42 AM 
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] rookie judge

    They should be scored. IMHO, it was a mistake to change the rule.

    --
    Gene Maurice 
    gene.maurice at comcast.net 
    Plano, TX

      -------------- Original message -------------- 
      From: "Keith Hoard" <khoard at gmail.com> 

      Speaking of scoring takeoffs and landings. . . . . does anyone have an opinion either way??

      On 3/24/06, Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote: 

        On Mar 24, 2006, at 10:11 PM, Keith Hoard wrote:

          Just write this down: 8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8.

          It works for me every time I judge. . . .

        Yeah, but those pesky takeoff and landing scores give you away every time.

        Ron Van Putte

        On 3/24/06, Pat Hewitt <phewitt at farmersagent.com > wrote: 
          This will be my first time at the Nats so please advise. I understand that I
          am to help judge but my issue with it is I don't think I would be a good 
          judge. I can do sportsman but it just would not be fair to the advanced guys
          please advise ( i will if its a must but i would be a much better scribe)

          Pat Hewitt
          Paola, Ks.

          ------ Original Message ------ 
          Received: 03:14 PM CST, 03/24/2006
          From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
          To: NSRCA Mailing List < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org >
          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Nats. 06 question

          On Mar 24, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Archie Stafford w! ! rote:

          > In every year past.   Intermediate flies at the same time as
          > Masters, and Advanced with FAI.  When they have flipped the time 
          > schedules, they've done it for both Masters/FAI and Intermediate/ 
          > Advanced.

          Let me expand on what Arch wrote.  The AMA property has three flying
          sites that we use for competition.  We use two sites for the Master 
          and F3A classes.  One site is used for Intermediate and Advanced.  As 
          a result of requiring each class of pilots to judge the next 'lower'
          class, Advanced can't fly at the same time as Intermediate.  The same
          is true for Master and F3A.  Master pilots judge Advanced and F3A, so
          they must fly in different sessions.  So, one session (either morning
          or afternoon on alternating years) will have Intermediate and Master
          pilots competing.  The other session will have Advan! ce! d and F3A 
          competing.  I hope this helps. 

          Ron Van Putte
          > From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto: nsrca-
          > discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of vicenterc at comcast.net
          > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 2:24 PM
          > To: NSRCA 
          > Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Nats. 06 question
          >
          >
          >
          > I am planing to go with a friend flying different classes to 2006 
          > Nats.  We would like to know what is the day time schedule for each 
          > class?  The idea is to call for each othe! r if! possible.
          >
          >
          >
          > Thanks,
          >
          >
          >
          > Vicente Bortone 
          >
          >
          >
          > _______________________________________________ 
          > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          ! http:! //lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

        -- 

        Keith Hoard
        Collierville, TN 
        khoard at gmail.com 

        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

      -- 

      Keith Hoard
      Collierville, TN
      khoard at gmail.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060325/0498c890/attachment.html 