[NSRCA-discussion] Motor Mount Bonding

vicenterc at comcast.net vicenterc at comcast.net
Wed Mar 22 03:03:05 AKST 2006


After all we love COMPETITION.

Vicente Bortone

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Derek Koopowitz" <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com> 

> I don't know if you've noticed but the one huge positive out of Jerry's 
> mounts is that the Hyde mount is now 1/2 the price it originally was... I 
> still say go with the Budd mount!! 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Cone 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:58 PM 
> To: NSRCA Mailing List 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Motor Mount Bonding 
> 
> While I have not personally tried a Budd Mount, I will now. This is new to 
> me. I have never heard of Chevrolet attacking Ford for having a recall. They 
> both make cars. And besides I can save some money on top of it all. Thanks 
> Merle for helping me make up my mind. 
> 
> Dennis Cone 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Mike Darr 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 4:54 PM 
> To: NSRCA Discussion 
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Motor Mount Bonding 
> 
> Merle Hyde asked me to post this on the discussion page for him. 
> 
> 
> Subj: Soft Mount Bonding 
> 
> "OH" really - so the adhesive is the final solution!!!! If the rubber 
> won't tear or fail first the bond is not sufficient. I have tested the 
> latest offering and it can also be pulled apart - peels off like a tougher 
> "lemon"!!!! Modelers really "NEED" a mount in a 2-20 thousand dollar 
> aircraft that can and probably will fail!!!! 
> 
> Approximately 40 rubber fabricators have been contacted to mass produce a 
> reliable rubber bond. They will prototype for $200,000-$300,000 with no 
> guarantees. The genuine Hyde Mount rubber bond is a 4-6 hour direct labor 
> process - with a proven life of over 7000 flights. Upon disassembly of 
> high time genuine Hyde Mounts it appears the bond would likely remain 
> reliable for 14,000 flights or equal to the expected rubber life!!!! 
> 
> Hyde Mounts are so reliable that even the severe cantilever force loads 
> imposed upon the rubber bonding of NO NOSE RING required Hyde Mounts have 
> been proven to endure thousands of flights without pull apart or failure. 
> 
> Some have experienced problems and beam breakage with undrilled nylon 
> composite beam Hyde Mounts offered several years ago. Modelers often did 
> not drill or install blinds nuts per suggestions provided. Hyde Mount nylon 
> beams when properly drilled are designed to break at around 100 lbs. force 
> load - or at around 50G's for a 2 lb. engine - aircraft snap at around 15-18 
> Gs. Hyde Mounts now with pre-drilled beams and blind nuts installed have 
> only been reported to break when crashed or impacted. The deliberate 100 
> lbs. force breakage point often prevents more severe damage to the 
> engine/crankshaft/firewall/aircraft/mount. 
> 
> Salvage your hardware investment: Reliable rubber bonding service 
> available for the "do-it-yourself" mount builder or other brands. Simply 
> send your preferred hardware parts and rubber to: Merle Hyde 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> Thanks - Merle 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060322/973bf172/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list