[NSRCA-discussion] 4.8 volt Vs 6.0 volt

Joe Lachowski jlachow at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 9 09:26:12 AKST 2006


Now, that explains Ed's erratic flying<g>


>From: "Ed Miller" <edbon85 at charter.net>
>Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 4.8 volt Vs 6.0 volt
>Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 11:46:51 -0500
>
>I've been flying unregulated 5 cell Nicad and NimH packs with Futaba
>coreless and digital servos since the early '90's with no apparent 
>problems.
>Servos are a little faster, develop a bit more torque and current drain is 
>a
>bit higher.
>Ed M.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bill Markovitz" <wdmarko at yahoo.com>
>To: <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:28 AM
>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 4.8 volt Vs 6.0 volt
>
>
> > Hi all..........I purchased a Quest and a Futaba 9CAF
> > at the WRAM show.  The 9CAF comes with 3151 digital
> > servos rated at 4.3 oz/in.  I would like to use these
> > servos with the 90 size Quest for competing in the
> > Intermediate class and won't be using it for 3D
> > flying.  Are these servos adequate for this
> > application?  If not, would going to 6 volts give me
> > the additonal torque that I need?  How much more
> > torque would going to 6 volts give me?  Are there any
> > known problems using an on-board 6 volt power supply?
> > The 9CAF manual states that driving the servos with a
> > 6 volt supply is an option.
> >
> > Thanks.............Bill       :)
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list