[NSRCA-discussion] 2C Pipe vs Muffler

jeffghughes at comcast.net jeffghughes at comcast.net
Mon Mar 6 14:56:43 AKST 2006


I was going through the data on Ed Hartley's 2 stroke page and noted that there is virtually no difference between a piped OS1.40 and a muffled OS1.40 for the prop sizes being used.  I assume that is because to get a nice linear throttle curve on a pipe, the pipe is deliberately set too long for peak horsepower. My question is why run a tuned pipe at all if you are going to set it too long for peak power?. Has anyone run back to back tests with same engine and plane with a pipe vs a muffler to see if there is truly a difference in power or feel?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060306/94f31438/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Tim" <twortkoetter at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fuel Regulation in 2C Engines
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:24:58 +0000
Size: 715
Url: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060306/94f31438/attachment.mht 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list