[NSRCA-discussion] Noise - Overfly - and DifferentAerobatic Model Types

[Dean Pappas]

I have suggested it, back before the new year, and I'll do it again.
Dean
 

Dean Pappas 
Sr. Design Engineer 
Kodeos Communications 
111 Corporate Blvd. 
South Plainfield, N.J. 07080 
(908) 222-7817 phone 
(908) 222-2392 fax 
d.pappas at kodeos.com 

Excerpted from Earl's reply:
 
Dean / Bob
 
You're both right on regarding noise footprint. Probably the biggest issue with the large gassers, and not necessarily IMAC. ...
 
Along comes a competition flyer practicing rollers and he becomes the example that the distance is OK, and enforcement becomes even more difficult.  I agree that rollers are neat maneuvers and that they simply don't fit within the "smaller footprint" concept. Dean, I like your proposal that they be replaced with rolling loops - keeps the complexity and solves the distance problem. Have you suggested this to Bob Skinner (F3A Subcommittee Chair)?  We're our own worst enemy - rollers can be flown much tighter, but no one does that - no wow factor! My alerts that the pattern rules don't provide a distance exception for rollers only resulted in a quasi exception. 
 
Earl
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060303/4c12d32d/attachment.html