[NSRCA-discussion] SNAP ROLLS

Jay Marshall lightfoot at sc.rr.com
Mon Jul 3 10:49:46 AKDT 2006


I can see the day when all pattern planes will have to carry a telemetry
package for the Nats! Now that I think of it, it might be a good practice
aid, but it would then change the airframe characteristics.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of R. LIPRIE
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 1:56 PM
To: MATTS NSRCA
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] SNAP ROLLS
 
Hey Nat,
 
        Will anyone ever come up with a solution to doing a snap roll I mean
there are so many perspectives of snap rolls from different people. Like the
other day I was flying my Fontana 90 and I did a true snap roll and the
other man told me that wasn't a snap roll. Now I no it was but we have
screwed up left field when it comes to snap rolls as you were saying. And I
believe there will never be a solution. Because even the Judging book for
pattern contest or different from other peoples perspective on snap rolls.
All I no is that you finally settle with one way to do it. And suddenly you
get to the contest and go out there and do what you think is a snap roll and
you get tremendously downgraded. Because it is not how the rule  book says
it. But someone send me a good info about how to do a snap roll the right
way. >From the Judges handbook.
 
Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060703/a9f30493/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list