[NSRCA-discussion] AAA NimH batterys
Jerry Budd
jerry at buddengineering.com
Sat Jan 28 06:41:12 AKST 2006
No, that was the year I flew Tony Frackowiak's old Gator 202 with an
OS140RX. I didn't have any chance at making the finals due to not
getting a flight in on the first day (fuel line came off the motor
while starting up on the first round - timmed out after 3 min, second
flight it quit just after takeoff - flooded out). It just wasn't my
year.
Thx, Jerry
>Jerry wasn't that your Webra setup??
> Steve Maxwell
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: Jerry Budd <jerry at buddengineering.com>
>> To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Date: 1/28/2006 4:02:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] AAA NimH batterys
>>
>> For the 2002 Nats I switched to a AAA 700 mAh NiMH battery pack to
>> make weight. While practicing at the Kokomo field I discovered that
>> the pack was good for about 1-1/2 flights (don't ask me how I know
>> that!).
>>
>> Fortunately, I got control back (well - partially) after the 1-1/2
>> downline snap and was able to coax the plane back onto the ground.
>> Not fun.
>>
>> At the post-flight debrief I figured out that the AAA cells simply
>> had too high of an internal impedance to deliver enough current to
>> keep the voltage above the receiver/servo cut-off level when all the
>> servos needed to move at once. I was using JR 7000 Super Servos for
>> aileron which went slow/shut off at 4.6V whereas the other JR servos
>> kept on working down to 4.2V.
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>
>> >Ed is right. The smaller the cells the higher the internal resistance.
>Run
>> >them down to 20% remaining capacity and put a heavy load, like 5 Amps on
>> >them and read the voltage. You will probably not like what you see.
>> >
>> >Jim O
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Ed Alt" <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
>> >To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 3:06 PM
>> >Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] AAA NimH batterys
>> >
>> >
>> >> Ed:
>> >> You might get disappointing results due to the inherently high
>internal
>> >> resistance of NiMH. Going with AAA cella and such a low capacity
>might
>> >mean
>> >> that you don't get as many flights as you expect before a voltage test
>> >under
>> >> load dips below an acceptable value.
>> >>
>> >> Ed
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Ed Miller" <edbon85 at charter.net>
>> >> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 9:05 AM
>> >> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] AAA NimH batterys
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Is anyone using AAA NimH batteries for a RX pack ??. I am looking at
>> >> > Batteries America ( EHYOST ) and they seem to have AAA NimH's in
>720,
>> >800
>> >> > and 900mah ratings. I currently use their 2/3A 5 cell NimH pack at
>> >1100mah
>> >> > and a weight of 3.85 ounces complete with the long lead I have on
>the
>> >> > pack.
>> >> > Going to their AAA 5 cell pack looks like I can save about an ounce
>or
>> >so.
>> >> > Mah isn't an issue, I can get in excess of 7 to 8 flights on the
>1100mah
>> >> > pack I use now before charging so going to 900mah shouldn't be a big
>> >hit.
>> >> > Don't suggest Lithium anything as lighter, want to continue to use
>my
>> >> > Alpha
>> >> > 4 charger and am not convinced those new batteries are safe.
>> > > > Ed M.
>>
>> --
>> ___________
>> Jerry Budd
>> Budd Engineering
>> (661) 722-5669 Voice/Fax
>> (661) 435-0358 Cell Phone
>> mailto:jerry at buddengineering.com
>> http://www.buddengineering.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
___________
Jerry Budd
Budd Engineering
(661) 722-5669 Voice/Fax
(661) 435-0358 Cell Phone
mailto:jerry at buddengineering.com
http://www.buddengineering.com
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list