[NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting

[Gray E Fowler]

Here here (or is it hear-hear?)! I agree....state's rights all the 
way......



Gray Fowler
Principal Chemical Engineer
Composites Engineering



ronlock at comcast.net 
Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
01/04/2006 03:32 PM
Please respond to
NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>


To
NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>, NSRCA Mailing List 
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
cc

Subject
Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting






There are LOTS of ways to determine a Dist Champ. 
Lots of systems have been devised, revised, revolutionized, etc.
Much of the effort is to find the "Fair" system.  IMO, all the systems
have a bias - best one shot contest, most contests attended, most 
consistent
showings, and on.  Best a District can do, is select a system with the
bias that seems most suitable for that Districts goals.  Each District can 

accept X number of contests outside it's district if they want, etc.
 
The Dist Champ program may be best left to each district.
 
Later, Ron Lockhart
 

> 
> George is on to something here. The question is: Who is our District 
> Champion? There are possible two answers. The first reflects which 
> member of the district scores the most points in contests held within 
> the district. The second reflects which member of the district scores 
> the most points in contests, no matter where they are held. I believe 
> the second answer is the proper one. The individual who gets the most 
> points, no matter the location, demonstrates his superiority over the 
> competition. That's my definition of a champion. 
> _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060104/237c8abd/attachment-0001.html