[NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Pattern Rules posted by AMA
Ed Miller
edbon85 at charter.net
Wed Dec 13 11:46:47 AKST 2006
So Dave are you saying in the FAI world, all radii are not created equal ??
:)
Ed M.
----- Original Message -----
From: <DaveL322 at comcast.net>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Pattern Rules posted by AMA
> I'd like nothing more than to see the new FAI convention overturned ASAP.
>
> 8 radii in a manuever, 7 are the same, 1 is different. Downgrade should
> be for one bad radius - matters not whether it was radii 1, 8, or 5 that
> was mismatched.
>
> The new FAI convention may simplify the judging process, but it is at the
> cost of accuracy. 1 step forward, 2 steps back.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>> Yes, but so is trying to figure out which radii are different from
>> the standard in a square loop or a square eight, when you're not
>> supposed to determine what the standard is until the end of the
>> maneuver.
>>
>> Now consider this: The new criteria for judging radii in these
>> maneuvers in F3A for 2007/2008 is that the standard is set by the
>> first radius. For a long time now, we have eventually adopted the
>> F3A rules interpretations. I wonder how long will it be before ANA
>> rules will reflect this interpretation.
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list