[NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Pattern Rules posted by AMA

[vicenterc at comcast.net]

Jason,

Snaps: I think that is valid for AMA.  In FAI I believe is a zero.

Regards,

Vicente "Vince" Bortone

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "JShulman" <jshulman at cfl.rr.com> 

I guess we can't zero snaps for not having a pitch break...lol. RCA-20, right side.

And the landing zone is essentially a 30m box. But it is not a 0 if you don't land in it, just a downgrade. But don't go knocking parts off of it, or it'll become a 0. RCA-26

Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com 
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of JonLowe at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:47 PM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Pattern Rules posted by AMA


Just noticed the 2007 Pattern rules have been posted by AMA.  They weren't there yesterday.

http://www.modelaircraft.org/comp/0708rulebook/RC%20Aerobatics.pdf

Jon Lowe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061213/33b9ba11/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "JShulman" <jshulman at cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Pattern Rules posted by AMA
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:59:33 +0000
Size: 716
Url: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061213/33b9ba11/attachment.mht